The structure of a research paper, and how to write one in 10 steps
By Mubarak MutesasiraUpdated 12 min read
Short answer:
The structure of a research paper is usually IMRaD: an introduction that states the problem and question, methods that say exactly what you did, results that report what you found, and a discussion that explains what it means. A title, abstract and references frame it. Write it in this order: methods, results, discussion, introduction, abstract, title.
This guide is for students writing their first academic research paper and early-career researchers preparing a journal article. It is the hub of our series on writing papers: it covers structure and steps, and links to using AI within the rules, journal and university AI policies and what happens to AI-generated papers.
What is the structure of a research paper?
A research paper is a document that reports original research or an original argument, shows the evidence behind it, and places it in the existing literature so others can check and build on it. Most empirical papers in the sciences, health and social sciences follow IMRaD, which became the dominant format in medical journals during the second half of the twentieth century [1].
IMRaD stands for Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion, the four core sections of an empirical research paper. Each answers one question a reader has:
| Section | Question it answers | Typical share of a 5,000-word paper | Main tense |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title | What is this paper about? | 10 to 20 words | n/a |
| Abstract | What was done and found, in brief? | 150 to 300 words | Past |
| Introduction | Why does this matter, and what is the question? | 15% (about 750 words) | Present for what is known, past for prior studies |
| Methods | What exactly did you do? | 20 to 25% (about 1,100 words) | Past |
| Results | What did you find? | 20 to 25% (about 1,100 words) | Past |
| Discussion | What does it mean, and what are the limits? | 25 to 30% (about 1,400 words) | Present for meaning, past for your findings |
| Conclusion | What is the answer in a few sentences? | 3 to 5% | Present |
| References | Which sources support your claims? | Not counted in most limits | n/a |
Shares are typical. The journal's author guidelines always win: some merge results and discussion or put methods last.
What about papers that are not empirical?
Review articles, theoretical papers and humanities papers use argument-led headings. They still need the same moves: a question, the evidence you examined and how you chose it, what the evidence shows, and why it matters. A literature review replaces "methods" with a description of how sources were found and selected.
How to write a research paper in 10 steps
These are the steps to write a research paper from a blank page to submission. Steps 1 to 4 are planning; most of the time goes into steps 3 and 5.
- Pick a topic you can narrow. Start broad ("remote work and well-being"), then narrow by population, setting and outcome ("remote work and sleep quality in call-center staff").
- Write one research question. A question you can answer with the data or sources you can get. See how to write a research question. If you test a prediction, add a hypothesis.
- Find and read sources. Search two or more databases, read abstracts to screen, then read the 15 to 30 papers that matter in full. Our guide on how to find sources for a research paper covers where to look.
- Outline the paper. Write each section's heading and two or three bullet points of what it will say. Give each section a word budget that adds up to the limit.
- Draft methods and results first. These are records of what you did and found, so they are the fastest to write.
- Draft the discussion, then the introduction. Now you know what the paper shows, the introduction can set up exactly that.
- Revise for argument, then for sentences. First check that every paragraph supports the question. Only then fix wording.
- Cite and check every reference. Confirm each source exists and says what you claim. See how to cite a research paper.
- Format to the journal or course guide. Headings, reference style, figure files, word count, declarations.
- Proofread and submit. Read it aloud once and check numbers against your tables.
How long does each step take?
Here is an example plan for a 5,000-word course research paper due in four weeks, at about 10 hours a week:
| Week | Steps | Hours |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Topic, question, search and screening | 10 |
| 2 | Full-text reading, notes, outline | 10 |
| 3 | Draft methods, results, discussion, introduction | 12 |
| 4 | Revise, cite, format, proofread | 8 |
That is 40 hours; a journal article usually needs longer for co-author comments.
What goes in each section of a research paper?
Title
A good title names the topic, population and design in 10 to 20 words. Example: "Remote work and sleep quality in call-center staff: a cross-sectional survey."
Abstract
An abstract is a 150 to 300 word summary of the paper's purpose, methods, main results and conclusion. Many journals require a structured abstract with labeled parts (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions). Include your main numbers. Write it last, and make sure every claim in it appears in the paper.
Example results sentence for an abstract (invented): "Of 412 respondents, those working remotely four or more days a week reported 34 minutes more sleep per night (95% CI 18 to 50) than office-based staff."
Introduction
The introduction moves from the general problem to your specific question in three moves, a pattern described by John Swales as "Create a Research Space" [2]:
- Establish the territory: why the topic matters, with evidence.
- Establish the niche: what is not yet known, contested or untested. This is the gap.
- Occupy the niche: your aim, question and, if you have them, hypotheses.
Keep it to three to five paragraphs, ending with the question.
Methods
The methods section is a description of what you did in enough detail that another researcher could repeat it. Cover the design, setting and participants (or data sources), sampling and sample size, measures and instruments, procedure, and analysis, naming the statistical tests and software. Report ethics approval and consent where people took part.
Use the reporting guideline for your design. The EQUATOR Network lists them, including CONSORT for randomized trials, STROBE for observational studies and PRISMA for systematic reviews [3]. Psychology and related fields use the APA Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS) [4]. Our methodology chapter guide covers this section in more depth.
Results
Report what you found, in the order of your questions, without interpreting it. Lead each paragraph with the main finding, then the numbers. Use tables for many exact values and figures for patterns. Every table and figure needs a number, a title and a mention in the text.
Example: "Mean sleep duration was 7.1 hours (SD 0.9) in the remote group and 6.5 hours (SD 1.1) in the office group, t(398) = 5.9, p < .001." If you need help choosing the test, see which statistical test to use.
Discussion
The discussion answers your question and argues for what the results mean. A reliable order:
- State the main finding in one or two sentences.
- Compare it with previous studies: where it agrees, where it differs and why.
- Explain the implications for practice, policy or theory.
- Name the limitations and how they affect your conclusions.
- Say what research should come next.
Do not introduce new results here, and do not claim more than your design allows: a cross-sectional survey shows association, not cause.
Conclusion
Some journals fold it into the discussion. If separate, give the answer to your question in three to five sentences, with no new citations.
References and declarations
Cite in the required style. Journals increasingly also ask for a data availability statement, funding, conflicts of interest, author contributions and a statement on AI use. Our post on AI policies in academia lists what major publishers require.
Free research paper outline template
Copy this into your document and fill in each bullet before you draft.
Title (10–20 words): topic, population, design
Abstract (250 words, write last)
1. Introduction (≈750 words)
- Problem and why it matters (2 sources)
- What is known (4–6 sources)
- Gap: what is not known
- Aim, question, hypotheses
2. Methods (≈1,100 words)
- Design and setting
- Participants / data: who, how many, how chosen
- Measures and instruments
- Procedure
- Analysis: tests, software
- Ethics approval and consent
3. Results (≈1,100 words)
- Sample description (Table 1)
- Finding for question 1 (Figure 1)
- Finding for question 2 (Table 2)
4. Discussion (≈1,400 words)
- Main finding in two sentences
- Comparison with previous studies
- Implications
- Limitations
- Future research
5. Conclusion (≈150 words)
References | Declarations | Appendices
What are the most common reviewer complaints?
Reviewers most often object to the fit between question, method and claims, not to grammar. These are the complaints you can fix before you submit:
| Complaint | What it looks like | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Unclear contribution | The introduction never says what is new | End the introduction with the gap and your question in one sentence each |
| Methods not reproducible | "Data were analyzed statistically" | Name the test, software, version and any exclusions |
| Overclaiming | Causal language from correlational data | Match verbs to design: "was associated with," not "caused" |
| Results and discussion mixed | Interpretation inside results | Move every "this suggests" sentence to the discussion |
| Thin or dated literature | Most references more than 10 years old | Search the last five years and cite the key recent studies |
| Missing limitations | No limitations paragraph | Name each limitation and its likely effect on the findings |
| Reference errors | Wrong years, missing DOIs, a paper that does not exist | Check every reference against the source |
If you get a decision letter, our guide on how to respond to reviewer comments walks through the reply. Before you submit, run your own check with how to review your own paper.
Where does AI help at each step?
AI is most useful for searching, organizing and checking, and least trustworthy for deciding what your evidence means. Most journals allow AI assistance with disclosure but do not accept AI as an author [5][6].
| Step | Useful AI help | What you must still do |
|---|---|---|
| Topic and question | Suggest narrower versions, test against FINER or PICO | Choose the question you can answer |
| Sources | Semantic search, summaries of abstracts | Read the key papers in full |
| Outline | Propose headings and a word budget | Decide the argument |
| Draft | Turn your notes into paragraphs, suggest citations | Check every citation supports its sentence |
| Revise | Flag unclear sentences, missing limitations | Accept or reject each change |
| Cite and check | Confirm references exist, flag retractions | Fix and re-verify |
The full workflow, including what to disclose, is in how to write a research paper with AI. The risks of letting AI write the whole paper are covered in AI-generated research papers.
How to write a research paper in AI for Research
AI for Research covers the steps above in one workspace. You supply the question, data and judgment.
- Find Papers searches 250M+ scholarly works with filters for year, study type and open access, at 0 credits. Save papers to My Library and ask a PDF questions, with answers that cite page numbers (1 credit a question).
- Writing Studio, Research paper drafts an IMRaD paper from your topic and notes, citing real papers (15 credits). Section writer and Abstract cost 3 credits each.
- The editor has cited autocomplete: as you type, it suggests the next sentence with a citation to a real paper, which you accept or ignore. The free plan includes 10 autocompletes a day. Cite in any of 10,000+ styles and export to Word or PDF (LaTeX on paid plans).
- Citation check confirms each reference exists and flags retractions and wrong years (0 credits). Claim check shows whether cited studies support up to 10 claims from a paragraph (2 credits).
- Reviewer scores a manuscript against criteria out of 10 and quotes each passage with a fix: 10 credits per 10,000 words, or a 3-credit preview of the first 3,000 words.
The free plan has 45 credits a month, enough for one draft and several section rewrites; see pricing. You can also try the research paper writer without an account. Limits: the drafts write up what you give them; they cannot collect data or decide what your results mean, and you must check each cited paper yourself.
FAQ
What are the parts of a research paper?
Most research papers have a title, an abstract, an introduction, a methods section, a results section, a discussion, a conclusion and a reference list. This is the IMRaD structure. Journals may add keywords, a data availability statement, funding and conflict of interest declarations, and an AI use statement. Humanities papers often use argument-led headings instead, but they still state a question, the evidence and an answer.
How long does it take to write a research paper?
A course paper of 3,000 to 5,000 words usually takes two to four weeks of part-time work, most of it reading. A journal article written from finished data often takes one to three months to draft, then more time for co-author comments. Planning the outline and drafting the methods first shortens both, because you stop rewriting the introduction.
In what order should I write a research paper?
Write the methods first, then the results, then the discussion, then the introduction, and the abstract and title last. Methods and results are facts you already have. The discussion interprets them, and the introduction sets up only the questions the discussion answers. Writing in reading order is the most common reason introductions promise more than the paper delivers.
How many sources should a research paper have?
It depends on the type and field. A short course paper might cite 8 to 15 sources. A journal article often cites 30 to 60, and a review article can cite well over 100. Check recent papers in your target journal and the reference limit in its author guidelines. Cite every claim that is not your own finding or common knowledge.
Can AI help me write a research paper?
Yes, for finding sources, outlining, drafting sections from your own notes, checking that citations exist and reviewing a draft. It cannot run your study or decide what your results mean, and most journals require you to disclose substantive AI use. Check every citation it suggests against the paper itself, because invented or misattributed references are the most common AI error.
Next steps
- Use AI for each step without breaking the rules: how to write a research paper with AI.
- Check what your journal or university allows: AI in academia: university and journal policies.
- Understand what goes wrong when AI writes the paper: AI-generated research papers.
- Turn a finished thesis chapter into a paper: thesis to journal article.
Sources
- Sollaci LB, Pereira MG. The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2004;92(3):364–371. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC442179/
- Swales JM. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press; 1990.
- EQUATOR Network. Reporting guidelines for main study types. https://www.equator-network.org/
- American Psychological Association. Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS). https://apastyle.apa.org/jars
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations, Section V.A: Use of AI by authors. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/artificial-intelligence/ai-use-by-authors.html (checked November 2026)
- Elsevier. Generative AI policies for journals. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals (checked November 2026)
- AI for Research. Research paper writer. /tools/research-paper-writer