article · Science · 2014
Designing Collective Behavior in a Termite-Inspired Robot Construction Team
Justin Werfel, Kirstin Petersen, Radhika Nagpal
Cited by 592Abstract and details only
Abstract
Complex systems are characterized by many independent components whose low-level actions produce collective high-level results. Predicting high-level results given low-level rules is a key open challenge; the inverse problem, finding low-level rules that give specific outcomes, is in general still less understood. We present a multi-agent construction system inspired by mound-building termites, solving such an inverse problem. A user specifies a desired structure, and the system automatically generates low-level rules for independent climbing robots that guarantee production of that structure. Robots use only local sensing and coordinate their activity via the shared environment. We demonstrate the approach via a physical realization with three autonomous climbing robots limited to onboard sensing. This work advances the aim of engineering complex systems that achieve specific human-designed goals.
Cite this paper
Werfel, J., Petersen, K., & Nagpal, R. (2014). Designing Collective Behavior in a Termite-Inspired Robot Construction Team. Science, 343(6172), 754–758. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245842
Werfel, Justin, et al. “Designing Collective Behavior in a Termite-Inspired Robot Construction Team.” Science, vol. 343, no. 6172, 2014, pp. 754–58, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245842.
Werfel, Justin, Kirstin Petersen, and Radhika Nagpal. 2014. “Designing Collective Behavior in a Termite-Inspired Robot Construction Team.” Science 343 (6172): 754–58. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245842.
Werfel, J., Petersen, K. and Nagpal, R. (2014) ‘Designing Collective Behavior in a Termite-Inspired Robot Construction Team’, Science, 343(6172), pp. 754–758. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245842.
@article{werfel2014designing,
title = {{Designing Collective Behavior in a Termite-Inspired Robot Construction Team}},
author = {Werfel, Justin and Petersen, Kirstin and Nagpal, Radhika},
journal = {Science},
volume = {343},
number = {6172},
pages = {754--758},
year = {2014},
doi = {10.1126/science.1245842}
}Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.
Related papers
Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"
Deborah Hawkins · 2017
Cited by 0
Personality correlates and utilitarian judgments in the everyday context: Psychopathic traits and differential effects of empathy, social dominance orientation, and dehumanization beliefs
Reina Takamatsu · Personality and Individual Differences · 2019
Cited by 25
Amount of altruistic punishment accounts for subsequent emotional gratification in participants with primary psychopathy
Keita Masui, Shouichi Iriguchi, Michio Nomura et al. · Personality and Individual Differences · 2011
Cited by 15
The Information Used to Judge Supportiveness Depends on Whether the Judgment Reflects the Personality of Perceivers, the Objective Characteristics of Targets, or their Unique Relationships
Brian Lakey, Catherine J. Lutz, Alan Scoboria · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · 2004
Cited by 17
The Mental Representations Of High And Low Entitativity Groups
Amy L. Johnson, Sarah Queller · Social Cognition · 2003
Cited by 13
Mediating Role of Unconditional Self-acceptance in Relationship Between College Students’ Perfectionism and Depression
Zhou Ya-juan, Guiyang · Zhongguo linchuang xinlixue zazhi · 2011
Cited by 0
Impatience-aggression, competitiveness and avoidant coping: direct and moderating effects on maladjustment among adolescents
Rapson Gomez · Personality and Individual Differences · 1998
Cited by 13
Perceiver self-presentational goals as moderators of expectancy influences: Ingratiation and the disconfirmation of negative expectancies.
Steven L. Neuberg, T. Nicole Judice, Lynn M. Virdin et al. · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 1993
Cited by 32