Skip to content
Free planNo credit card requiredStart writing

review · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · 2005

Evaluation and interpretation of maternal toxicity in Segment II studies: Issues, some answers, and data needs

John M. Rogers, Neil Chernoff, Carl L. Keen, G. P. Daston

Cited by 29Abstract and details only

Abstract

The index has no abstract for this paper. The publisher’s page may have one.

Cite this paper

APA 7

Rogers, J. M., Chernoff, N., Keen, C. L., & Daston, G. P. (2005). Evaluation and interpretation of maternal toxicity in Segment II studies: Issues, some answers, and data needs. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 207(2), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2005.03.026

MLA 9

Rogers, John M., et al. “Evaluation and interpretation of maternal toxicity in Segment II studies: Issues, some answers, and data needs.” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 207, no. 2, 2005, pp. 367–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2005.03.026.

Chicago

Rogers, John M., Neil Chernoff, Carl L. Keen, and G. P. Daston. 2005. “Evaluation and interpretation of maternal toxicity in Segment II studies: Issues, some answers, and data needs.” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 207 (2): 367–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2005.03.026.

Harvard

Rogers, J.M. et al. (2005) ‘Evaluation and interpretation of maternal toxicity in Segment II studies: Issues, some answers, and data needs’, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 207(2), pp. 367–374. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2005.03.026.

BibTeX
@article{rogers2005evaluation,
  title = {{Evaluation and interpretation of maternal toxicity in Segment II studies: Issues, some answers, and data needs}},
  author = {Rogers, John M. and Chernoff, Neil and Keen, Carl L. and Daston, G. P.},
  journal = {Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology},
  volume = {207},
  number = {2},
  pages = {367--374},
  year = {2005},
  doi = {10.1016/j.taap.2005.03.026}
}

Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.