article · American Psychologist · 1971

Predictive value compared to predictive validity.

Cited by 8Abstract and details only

Abstract

The index has no abstract for this paper. The publisher’s page may have one.

Cite this paper

Curtis, E. W. (1971). Predictive value compared to predictive validity. American Psychologist, 26(10), 908–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032260

MLA 9

Curtis, Ervin W. “Predictive value compared to predictive validity.” American Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 10, 1971, pp. 908–14, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032260.

Chicago

Curtis, Ervin W. 1971. “Predictive value compared to predictive validity.” American Psychologist 26 (10): 908–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032260.

Harvard

Curtis, E.W. (1971) ‘Predictive value compared to predictive validity’, American Psychologist, 26(10), pp. 908–914. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032260.

BibTeX

@article{curtis1971predictive,
  title = {{Predictive value compared to predictive validity.}},
  author = {Curtis, Ervin W.},
  journal = {American Psychologist},
  volume = {26},
  number = {10},
  pages = {908--914},
  year = {1971},
  doi = {10.1037/h0032260}
}

Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.