article · European Journal of Ophthalmology · 2007

Comparison of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm and Full Threshold Algorithm for Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss

Yuki Aoki, Genichiro Takahashi, Kenji Kitahara

Cited by 16Abstract and details only

Abstract

Glaucomatous defects were measured as being significantly shallower and larger with SS than with FT. In addition, the prevalence of visual field defect was higher with SS according to some of the criteria for glaucomatous visual field defects. These results might be related to the fact that SS strategy has a lower variability and to the Bayesian statistical properties of the SITA algorithm.

Cite this paper

APA 7

Aoki, Y., Takahashi, G., & Kitahara, K. (2007). Comparison of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm and Full Threshold Algorithm for Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 17(2), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210701700208

MLA 9

Aoki, Yuki, et al. “Comparison of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm and Full Threshold Algorithm for Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss.” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 17, no. 2, 2007, pp. 196–202, https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210701700208.

Chicago

Aoki, Yuki, Genichiro Takahashi, and Kenji Kitahara. 2007. “Comparison of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm and Full Threshold Algorithm for Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss.” European Journal of Ophthalmology 17 (2): 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210701700208.

Harvard

Aoki, Y., Takahashi, G. and Kitahara, K. (2007) ‘Comparison of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm and Full Threshold Algorithm for Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss’, European Journal of Ophthalmology, 17(2), pp. 196–202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210701700208.

BibTeX

@article{aoki2007comparison,
  title = {{Comparison of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm and Full Threshold Algorithm for Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss}},
  author = {Aoki, Yuki and Takahashi, Genichiro and Kitahara, Kenji},
  journal = {European Journal of Ophthalmology},
  volume = {17},
  number = {2},
  pages = {196--202},
  year = {2007},
  doi = {10.1177/112067210701700208}
}

Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.