article · 2015
A guide to the EU variation procedure from a quality viewpoint
Cornelia Nopitsch-Mai, Susanne Winterscheid
Cited by 0Abstract and details only
Abstract
This article gives an overview from a regulator’s perspective on the European variation procedure for type IA, type IB and type II variations, including line extensions. Grouping and worksharing processes which should facilitate variation procedures are briefly depicted. Some advice is given on how to avoid unnecessary variation procedures. Four case studies are outlined to illustrate best practice for variation procedures. The fideals with the update of an active substance master fi(ASMF), whereas the second case study illustrates grouping of consequential changes. The third case study reviews sections of Module 3 which should be updated concerning addition of a new supplier of a drug substance which is covered by a certifi cate of suitability (CEP). An example of an unforeseen variation is presented in the fourth case.
Cite this paper
Nopitsch-Mai, C., & Winterscheid, S. (2015). A guide to the EU variation procedure from a quality viewpoint.
Nopitsch-Mai, Cornelia, and Susanne Winterscheid. “A guide to the EU variation procedure from a quality viewpoint.” 2015.
Nopitsch-Mai, Cornelia, and Susanne Winterscheid. 2015. “A guide to the EU variation procedure from a quality viewpoint.”
Nopitsch-Mai, C. and Winterscheid, S. (2015) ‘A guide to the EU variation procedure from a quality viewpoint’.
@article{nopitschmai2015guide,
title = {{A guide to the EU variation procedure from a quality viewpoint}},
author = {Nopitsch-Mai, Cornelia and Winterscheid, Susanne},
year = {2015}
}Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.
Related papers
Reviewing the values of a standard operating procedure.
Gidey Amare · Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences · 2012
Cited by 28Open access
Recommendations for Choosing Single-Case Data Analytical Techniques
Rumen Manolov, Mariola Moeyaert · Behavior Therapy · 2016
Cited by 143Open access
Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures
Doug S Butterworth · ICES Journal of Marine Science · 1999
Cited by 373Open access
Analysis of Policy Movement in a Merit-Rating Program: An Application of Markov Processes
Daniel E. Molnar, T H Rockwell · Journal of Risk & Insurance · 1966
Cited by 7
Procedure for Reviewing Environmental Impact Statements
Ravi Jain, Lloyd V. Urban, Harold E. Balbach et al. · Elsevier eBooks · 2012
Cited by 0
Evaluation of results
Till M. Bachmann · Trace metals and other contaminants in the environment · 2006
Cited by 0