article · Heart · 2011
Safety and efficacy of early versus elective percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with non-ST segment elevation infarction
F. Xianghua, Wang Yanbo, Meng Haiyun, Gu Xinshun, Wang Xuechao, Yanming Fan
Cited by 0Open access
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the safety and efficacy of early percutaneous coronary intervention (early PCI) in patients with non-ST Segment elevation infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing elective PCI. Methods Ninety-one patients (79 males) who suffered from first NSTEMI within 24 h from symptom onset during October 2009 and July 2010 were enrolled in this study. All the cases were randomly divided into early PCI group (n=44) and elective PCI group (n=47). PCI was performed immediately after admission in early PCI group. Patients in elective PCI group received the same medical therapies with those in early PCI group, and PCI was performed 7–10 days after admission. TIMI flow of IRA before and after PCI, as well as TIMI Myocardial perfusion grading (TMP) after PCI were compared between the two groups. The differences of left ventricular function and MACE during hospitalisation and 6-month follow-up were analysed. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. There were no differences in the rates of IRA total occlusion, TIMI flow grade 1, and TIMI flow grade 2 before PCI between the two groups (all p>0.05), while the rate of TIMI flow grade 3 in early PCI group was lower than that in elective group (22.73% vs 42.55%, p<0.05). After PCI treatment, no significant differences in TIMI flow were found between the two groups, and the rate of TMP grade 2 or greater in early PCI group was higher (79.55% vs 59.57%, p<0.05). There were no significant differences in LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF between the two groups in hospital (all p>0.05). After 6-month follow-up, both LVEDV and LVESV decreased significantly, and LVEF increased. The incidence of cardiac rehospitalisation was lower in early PCI group, while the cardiac death, severe heart failure, reinfarction, malignant arrhythmias, revasculisation of IRA, and bleeding complications were similar. Conclusions Both early and elective PCI can improve the heart function in NSTEMI patients at 6 months, and the effects of early PCI on improving heart function is better without increase of bleeding complications.
Cite this paper
Xianghua, F., Yanbo, W., Haiyun, M., Xinshun, G., Xuechao, W., & Fan, Y. (2011). Safety and efficacy of early versus elective percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with non-ST segment elevation infarction. Heart, 97(Suppl 3), A152.1–A152. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300867.443
Xianghua, F., et al. “Safety and efficacy of early versus elective percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with non-ST segment elevation infarction.” Heart, vol. 97, no. Suppl 3, 2011, pp. A152.1–A152, https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300867.443.
Xianghua, F., Wang Yanbo, Meng Haiyun, Gu Xinshun, Wang Xuechao, and Yanming Fan. 2011. “Safety and efficacy of early versus elective percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with non-ST segment elevation infarction.” Heart 97 (Suppl 3): A152.1–A152. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300867.443.
Xianghua, F. et al. (2011) ‘Safety and efficacy of early versus elective percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with non-ST segment elevation infarction’, Heart, 97(Suppl 3), pp. A152.1–A152. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300867.443.
@article{xianghua2011safety,
title = {{Safety and efficacy of early versus elective percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with non-ST segment elevation infarction}},
author = {Xianghua, F. and Yanbo, Wang and Haiyun, Meng and Xinshun, Gu and Xuechao, Wang and Fan, Yanming},
journal = {Heart},
volume = {97},
number = {Suppl 3},
pages = {A152.1--A152},
year = {2011},
doi = {10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300867.443}
}Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.
Related papers
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Early and Delayed Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Culprit Lesion in Patients with Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Yae Ota, Kenichi Sakakura, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi et al. · Internal Medicine · 2025
Cited by 1Open access
Influence of the Timing of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Clinical Outcomes in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Kamuran Tekin, Çağlar Emre Çağlıyan, İbrahim Halil Tanboğa et al. · Korean Circulation Journal · 2013
Cited by 24Open access
Early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with non‐ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
Naveen Rajpurohit, Nadish Garg, Rajeev Garg et al. · Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions · 2012
Cited by 27
Impact of PCI Timing on Short Term Outcome in Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infraction
Sayed Abd El.Khalik, Ali Ibrahim Attia, Hazem Abdelraouf et al. · Benha Medical Journal · 2021
Cited by 0Open access
The Impact of Timing of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on the Prognosis of Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients
Tianzhu Li, Nimin Lu, Yingxue Dong · Annali Italiani di Chirurgia · 2025
Cited by 0Open access
Prognosis According to the Timing of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in an Acute Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Sung Gyu An, Tae Ik Park, Sang Hyun Lee et al. · Korean Circulation Journal · 2008
Cited by 2
The long-term clinical benefit of early versus delayed invasive strategies in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention
Jeong Cheon Choe, Min Suk Kim, S H Lee et al. · European Heart Journal · 2024
Cited by 0Open access
Timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a SWEDEHEART study
Daniel P. Lindholm, Joakim Alfredsson, Oskar Angerås et al. · European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes · 2016
Cited by 19