article · International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics · 2018
Synchronous self-learning Pareto strategy
Cited by 3Abstract and details only
Abstract
Purpose In recent decades, development of effective methods for optimizing a set of conflicted objective functions has been absorbing an increasing interest from researchers. This refers to the essence of real-life engineering systems and complex natural mechanisms which are generally multi-modal, non-convex and multi-criterion. Until now, several deterministic and stochastic methods have been proposed to cope with such complex systems. Advanced soft computational methods such as evolutionary games (cooperative and non-cooperative), Pareto-based techniques, fuzzy evolutionary methods, cooperative bio-inspired algorithms and neuro-evolutionary systems have effectively come to the aid of researchers to build up efficient paradigms with application to vector optimization. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach A novel hybrid algorithm called synchronous self-learning Pareto strategy (SSLPS) is presented for the sake of vector optimization. The method is the ensemble of evolutionary algorithms (EA), swarm intelligence (SI), adaptive version of self-organizing map (CSOM) and a data shuffling mechanism. EA are powerful numerical optimization algorithms capable of finding a global extreme point over a wide exploration domain. SI techniques (the swarm of bees in our case) can improve both intensification and robustness of exploration. CSOM network is an unsupervised learning methodology which learns the characteristics of non-dominated solutions and, thus, enhances the quality of the Pareto front. Findings To prove the effectiveness of the proposed method, the authors engage a set of well-known benchmark functions and some well-known rival optimization methods. Additionally, SSLPS is employed for optimal design of shape memory alloy actuator as a nonlinear multi-modal real-world engineering problem. The experiments show the acceptable potential of SSLPS for handling both numerical and engineering multi-objective problems. Originality/value To the author’s best knowledge, the proposed algorithm is among the rare multi-objective methods which fosters the use of automated unsupervised learning for increasing the intensity of Pareto front (while preserving the diversity). Also, the research evaluates the power of hybridization of SI and EA for efficient search.
Cite this paper
Mozaffari, A. (2018). Synchronous self-learning Pareto strategy. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, 11(2), 197–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijicc-05-2017-0050
Mozaffari, Ahmad. “Synchronous self-learning Pareto strategy.” International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, vol. 11, no. 2, 2018, pp. 197–233, https://doi.org/10.1108/ijicc-05-2017-0050.
Mozaffari, Ahmad. 2018. “Synchronous self-learning Pareto strategy.” International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics 11 (2): 197–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijicc-05-2017-0050.
Mozaffari, A. (2018) ‘Synchronous self-learning Pareto strategy’, International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, 11(2), pp. 197–233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijicc-05-2017-0050.
@article{mozaffari2018synchronous,
title = {{Synchronous self-learning Pareto strategy}},
author = {Mozaffari, Ahmad},
journal = {International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics},
volume = {11},
number = {2},
pages = {197--233},
year = {2018},
doi = {10.1108/ijicc-05-2017-0050}
}Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.
Related papers
Engineering benchmark generation and performance measurement of evolutionary algorithms
Joong Hoon Kim, Ho Min Lee, Donghwi Jung et al. · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · 2017
Cited by 4
A Benchmark TEAM Problem for Multi-Objective Pareto Optimization in Magnetics: The Time-Harmonic Regime
Paolo Di Barba, Fabrizio Dughiero, Michele Forzan et al. · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2019
Cited by 6Open access
Smart Pareto filter: obtaining a minimal representation of multiobjective design space
Christopher A. Mattson, Anoop A. Mullur, Achille Messac · Engineering Optimization · 2004
Cited by 157
Metrics for Quality Assessment of a Multiobjective Design Optimization Solution Set
Jin Xiang Wu, Shapour Azarm · ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE) · 2000
Cited by 12
Metrics for Quality Assessment of a Multiobjective Design Optimization Solution Set
Jin Wu, Shapour Azarm · Journal of Mechanical Design · 2000
Cited by 278
Guiding Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization With Generic Front Modeling
Ye Tian, Xingyi Zhang, Ran Cheng et al. · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2018
Cited by 97
Multiobjective Optimization Algorithm Based on Evolutionary Strategy
Lianwei Zheng · Control Engineering of China · 2007
Cited by 1
TU‐E‐204C‐01: Basic Concepts in Multicriteria Optimization and Their Application in Radiation Therapy
Thomas R Bortfeld · Medical Physics · 2010
Cited by 0