preprint · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2013
Diagnosis of Multiple Faults: A Sensitivity Analysis
Cited by 0Open access
Abstract
We compare the diagnostic accuracy of three diagnostic inference models: the simple Bayes model, the multimembership Bayes model, which is isomorphic to the parallel combination function in the certainty-factor model, and a model that incorporates the noisy OR-gate interaction. The comparison is done on 20 clinicopathological conference (CPC) cases from the American Journal of Medicine-challenging cases describing actual patients often with multiple disorders. We find that the distributions produced by the noisy OR model agree most closely with the gold-standard diagnoses, although substantial differences exist between the distributions and the diagnoses. In addition, we find that the multimembership Bayes model tends to significantly overestimate the posterior probabilities of diseases, whereas the simple Bayes model tends to significantly underestimate the posterior probabilities. Our results suggest that additional work to refine the noisy OR model for internal medicine will be worthwhile.
Cite this paper
Heckerman, D., & Shwe, M. (2013). Diagnosis of Multiple Faults: A Sensitivity Analysis. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1303.1463
Heckerman, David, and Michael Shwe. “Diagnosis of Multiple Faults: A Sensitivity Analysis.” arXiv (Cornell University), 2013, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1303.1463.
Heckerman, David, and Michael Shwe. 2013. “Diagnosis of Multiple Faults: A Sensitivity Analysis.” arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1303.1463.
Heckerman, D. and Shwe, M. (2013) ‘Diagnosis of Multiple Faults: A Sensitivity Analysis’, arXiv (Cornell University). Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1303.1463.
@misc{heckerman2013diagnosis,
title = {{Diagnosis of Multiple Faults: A Sensitivity Analysis}},
author = {Heckerman, David and Shwe, Michael},
journal = {arXiv (Cornell University)},
year = {2013},
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.1303.1463}
}Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.
Related papers
Diagnosis of Multiple Faults: A Sensitivity Analysis
David E. Heckerman, Michael Shwe · Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · 1993
Cited by 8
A Comparison of Learning Rate Selection Methods in Generalized Bayesian Inference
Pei-Shien Wu, Ryan Martin · Bayesian Analysis · 2022
Cited by 57Open access
Reproducible Model Selection Using Bagged Posteriors
Jonathan H. Huggins, Jeffrey W. Miller · Bayesian Analysis · 2022
Cited by 23Open access
Robust Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis for Case–Control Studies with Uncertain Exposure Misclassification Probabilities
Timothy Shin Heng Mak, Nicky Best, Lesley Rushton · The International Journal of Biostatistics · 2015
Cited by 6
Bayesian Model Selection for Incomplete Data Using the Posterior Predictive Distribution
Michael J. Daniels, Arkendu S. Chatterjee, Chenguang Wang · Biometrics · 2012
Cited by 16Open access
Case–Control Analysis with Partial Knowledge of Exposure Misclassification Probabilities
Paul Gustafson, Nhu D. Le, Refik Saskin · Biometrics · 2001
Cited by 102
On the relation between the true and sample correlations under Bayesian modelling of gene expression datasets
Royi Jacobovic · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · 2018
Cited by 1