preprint · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Rishi Bommasani, Drew A. Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ B. Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S. Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosselut, Emma Brunskill, Erik Brynjolfsson, Shyamal Buch, Dallas Card, Rodrigo Castellon, Niladri S. Chatterji, Annie Chen, Kathleen Creel, Jared Quincy Davis, Dorottya Demszky, Chris Donahue, Moussa Doumbouya, Esin Durmus, Stefano Ermon, John Etchemendy, Kawin Ethayarajh, Li Fei-Fei, Chelsea Finn, Trevor Gale, Lauren Gillespie, Karan Goel, Noah D. Goodman, Shelby Grossman, Neel Guha, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Peter Henderson, John Hewitt, Daniel E. Ho, Jenny Hong, Kyle Hsu, Jing Huang, Thomas Icard, Saahil Jain, Dan Jurafsky, Pratyusha Kalluri, Siddharth Karamcheti, Geoff Keeling, Fereshte Khani, Omar Khattab, Pang Wei Koh, Mark Krass and 64 more
Cited by 2,119Open access
Abstract
AI is undergoing a paradigm shift with the rise of models (e.g., BERT, DALL-E, GPT-3) that are trained on broad data at scale and are adaptable to a wide range of downstream tasks. We call these models foundation models to underscore their critically central yet incomplete character. This report provides a thorough account of the opportunities and risks of foundation models, ranging from their capabilities (e.g., language, vision, robotics, reasoning, human interaction) and technical principles(e.g., model architectures, training procedures, data, systems, security, evaluation, theory) to their applications (e.g., law, healthcare, education) and societal impact (e.g., inequity, misuse, economic and environmental impact, legal and ethical considerations). Though foundation models are based on standard deep learning and transfer learning, their scale results in new emergent capabilities,and their effectiveness across so many tasks incentivizes homogenization. Homogenization provides powerful leverage but demands caution, as the defects of the foundation model are inherited by all the adapted models downstream. Despite the impending widespread deployment of foundation models, we currently lack a clear understanding of how they work, when they fail, and what they are even capable of due to their emergent properties. To tackle these questions, we believe much of the critical research on foundation models will require deep interdisciplinary collaboration commensurate with their fundamentally sociotechnical nature.
Cite this paper
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R. B., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., Brynjolfsson, E., Buch, S., Card, D., Castellon, R., Chatterji, N. S., Chen, A., Creel, K., Davis, J. Q., Demszky, D., . . . Krass, M. (2021). On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258
Bommasani, Rishi, et al. “On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models.” arXiv (Cornell University), 2021, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258.
Bommasani, Rishi, Drew A. Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ B. Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S. Bernstein, et al. 2021. “On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models.” arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258.
Bommasani, R. et al. (2021) ‘On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models’, arXiv (Cornell University). Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258.
@misc{bommasani2021opportunities,
title = {{On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models}},
author = {Bommasani, Rishi and Hudson, Drew A. and Adeli, Ehsan and Altman, Russ B. and Arora, Simran and von Arx, Sydney and Bernstein, Michael S. and Bohg, Jeannette and Bosselut, Antoine and Brunskill, Emma and Brynjolfsson, Erik and Buch, Shyamal and Card, Dallas and Castellon, Rodrigo and Chatterji, Niladri S. and Chen, Annie and Creel, Kathleen and Davis, Jared Quincy and Demszky, Dorottya and Donahue, Chris and Doumbouya, Moussa and Durmus, Esin and Ermon, Stefano and Etchemendy, John and Ethayarajh, Kawin and Fei-Fei, Li and Finn, Chelsea and Gale, Trevor and Gillespie, Lauren and Goel, Karan and Goodman, Noah D. and Grossman, Shelby and Guha, Neel and Hashimoto, Tatsunori and Henderson, Peter and Hewitt, John and Ho, Daniel E. and Hong, Jenny and Hsu, Kyle and Huang, Jing and Icard, Thomas and Jain, Saahil and Jurafsky, Dan and Kalluri, Pratyusha and Karamcheti, Siddharth and Keeling, Geoff and Khani, Fereshte and Khattab, Omar and Koh, Pang Wei and Krass, Mark and others},
journal = {arXiv (Cornell University)},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258}
}Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.
Related papers
Emerging innovation networks and the print-on-paper sociotechnical regime
Athena Piterou, Fred Steward · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · 2011
Cited by 6Open access
Sociotechnical stability and equilibrium
James Thomas Erbaugh, Christopher W. Callahan, Rebecca Finger Higgens et al. · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · 2021
Cited by 9
A network perspective on sociotechnical transitions: the print-on-paper sociotechnical system
Athena Piterou, Fred Steward · 2010
Cited by 0
Simply Complex: Are LED Outdoor Activities Complex Sociotechnical Systems?
Tony Carden, Paul M. Salmon · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · 2016
Cited by 1
What is the relationship between sociotechnical transition and disruptive innovations?
Yorgos Marinakis, Steven T. Walsh, Reilly White · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · 2023
Cited by 29
Sociotechnical Perspectives on Technological Development
Patrik Thollander, Jenny Palm · Springer eBooks · 2012
Cited by 0
Investigating Social Information Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study
Nadja Piedade de Antônio, Juliana Costa Fernandes, Sandro Luis Silva et al. · Anais do Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação (SBSI) · 2019
Cited by 2
Clarifying the nature of failure in sociotechnical systems: ambiguity-based failure and expectation-based failure
Eric Thomson Kerr, Vivek Kant · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · 2022
Cited by 6