book chapter · Oxford University Press eBooks · 2020
Mathematical Determinacy
Cited by 0Abstract and details only
Abstract
This chapter addresses the second major challenge for the extension of conventionalism from logic to mathematics: the richness of mathematical truth. The chapter begins by distinguishing indeterminacy from pluralism and clarifying the crucial notion of open-endedness. It then critically discusses the two major strategies for securing arithmetical categoricity using open-endedness; one based on a collapse theorem, the other on a kind of anti-overspill idea. With this done, a new argument for the categoricity of arithmetic is then presented. In subsequent discussion, the philosophical importance of this categoricity result is called into question to some degree. The categoricity argument is then supplemented by an appeal to the infinitary omega rule, and an argument is given that beings like us can actually follow the omega rule without any violation of Church’s thesis. Finally, the chapter discusses the extension of this type of approach beyond arithmetic, to set theory and the rest of mathematics.
Cite this paper
Warren, J. S. (2020). Mathematical Determinacy. Oxford University Press eBooks, 239–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190086152.003.0010
Warren, Jared S. “Mathematical Determinacy.” Oxford University Press eBooks, 2020, pp. 239–75, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190086152.003.0010.
Warren, Jared S. 2020. “Mathematical Determinacy.” Oxford University Press eBooks: 239–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190086152.003.0010.
Warren, J.S. (2020) ‘Mathematical Determinacy’, Oxford University Press eBooks, pp. 239–275. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190086152.003.0010.
@incollection{warren2020mathematical,
title = {{Mathematical Determinacy}},
author = {Warren, Jared S.},
booktitle = {Oxford University Press eBooks},
pages = {239--275},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1093/oso/9780190086152.003.0010}
}Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.