article · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · 2022
Discriminator-Quality Evaluation GAN
Xuesong Wang, Ke Jin, Yi Kong, C. L. Philip Chen, Yuhu Cheng
Cited by 7Abstract and details only
Abstract
In existing generative adversarial networks (standard GAN and its variants), the discriminator is trained for recognizing the real data as positive while the generated data as negative. This kind of positive-negative classification criterion ignores the fact that the discriminator is a non-objective evaluator, which means that the image quality evaluated by the discriminator may fluctuate during the whole training progress. Considering this fact, we propose a novel GAN framework called Discriminator-Quality Evaluation GAN (DQE-GAN) by using the discriminator outputs to evaluate image quality. By dynamically classifying images into high discriminator-quality and low discriminator-quality samples, every adversarial iteration step can be more reasonable and objective. The convergence of DQE-GAN framework can be theoretically proved. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate DQE-GANs’ ability of achieving better generated images faster and more stable.
Cite this paper
Wang, X., Jin, K., Kong, Y., Chen, C. L. P., & Cheng, Y. (2022). Discriminator-Quality Evaluation GAN. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 25, 4081–4093. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2022.3171084
Wang, Xuesong, et al. “Discriminator-Quality Evaluation GAN.” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 25, 2022, pp. 4081–93, https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2022.3171084.
Wang, Xuesong, Ke Jin, Yi Kong, C. L. Philip Chen, and Yuhu Cheng. 2022. “Discriminator-Quality Evaluation GAN.” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 25: 4081–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2022.3171084.
Wang, X. et al. (2022) ‘Discriminator-Quality Evaluation GAN’, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 25, pp. 4081–4093. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2022.3171084.
@article{wang2022discriminator,
title = {{Discriminator-Quality Evaluation GAN}},
author = {Wang, Xuesong and Jin, Ke and Kong, Yi and Chen, C. L. Philip and Cheng, Yuhu},
journal = {IEEE Transactions on Multimedia},
volume = {25},
pages = {4081--4093},
year = {2022},
doi = {10.1109/tmm.2022.3171084}
}Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.
Related papers
GIQA: Generated Image Quality Assessment
Shuyang Gu, Jianmin Bao, Dong Chen et al. · Lecture notes in computer science · 2020
Cited by 92Open access
Recycling Discriminator: Towards Opinion-Unaware Image Quality Assessment Using Wasserstein GAN
Yunan Zhu, Haichuan Ma, Jialun Peng et al. · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · 2021
Cited by 12
Quality Aware Generative Adversarial Networks
Parimala Kancharla, Sumohana S. Channappayya · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Cited by 21Open access
Quality Prediction on Deep Generative Images
Hyunsuk Ko, Dae Yeol Lee, Seunghyun Cho et al. · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2020
Cited by 29Open access
Likelihood Estimation for Generative Adversarial Networks
Hamid Eghbal-zadeh, Gerhard Widmer · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2017
Cited by 13Open access
A performance analysis of the generative adversarial networks
Heiki Riesenkampf · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · 2018
Cited by 0Open access
Image Generation Method Based on Improved Generative Adversarial Network
Huanjun Zhang · Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications · 2023
Cited by 0
Guiding the training of Generative Adversarial Networks
Simen Selseng · BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) · 2017
Cited by 1Open access