article · 2022
Cognitive Simplification Operations Improve Text Simplification
Cited by 4Open access
Abstract
Text Simplification (TS) is the task of converting a text into a form that is easier to read while maintaining the meaning of the original text. A sub-task of TS is Cognitive Simplification (CS), converting text to a form that is readily understood by people with cognitive disabilities without rendering it childish or simplistic. This sub-task has yet to be explored with neural methods in NLP, and resources for it are scarcely available. In this paper, we present a method for incorporating knowledge from the cognitive accessibility domain into a TS model, by introducing an inductive bias regarding what simplification operations to use. We show that by adding this inductive bias to a TS-trained model, it is able to adapt better to CS without ever seeing CS data, and outperform a baseline model on a traditional TS benchmark. In addition, we provide a novel test dataset for CS, and analyze the differences between CS corpora and existing TS corpora, in terms of how simplification operations are applied.
Cite this paper
Chamovitz, E., & Abend, O. (2022). Cognitive Simplification Operations Improve Text Simplification. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.conll-1.17
Chamovitz, Eytan, and Omri Abend. “Cognitive Simplification Operations Improve Text Simplification.” 2022, pp. 241–65, https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.conll-1.17.
Chamovitz, Eytan, and Omri Abend. 2022. “Cognitive Simplification Operations Improve Text Simplification.” https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.conll-1.17.
Chamovitz, E. and Abend, O. (2022) ‘Cognitive Simplification Operations Improve Text Simplification’. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.conll-1.17.
@article{chamovitz2022cognitive,
title = {{Cognitive Simplification Operations Improve Text Simplification}},
author = {Chamovitz, Eytan and Abend, Omri},
pages = {241--265},
year = {2022},
doi = {10.18653/v1/2022.conll-1.17}
}Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.
Related papers
Theoretical Analysis of the Benchmark for Choosing Manipulative Instruments of Monetary Policies
Zhu En-tao · Yuejiang Academic Journal · 2009
Cited by 0
Exploring disk performance benchmarks
Kazimierz Krosman, Janusz S. Sosnowski · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2017
Cited by 0
Support Structure Performance Benchmark
Katharina Bartsch · Light Engineering für die Praxis · 2023
Cited by 0
Solutions to the Third Benchmark Control Problem
Chien Yao Huang, Dean K. Frederick · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · 1991
Cited by 3
A Benchmark Test Structure for Experimental Dynamic Substructuring
Paul L. C. van der Valk, J. B. van Wuijckhuijse, D. de Klerk · River Publishers eBooks · 2011
Cited by 9
Benchmark Evaluation
Max Gath · Springer eBooks · 2016
Cited by 0
A Benchmark Characterization of the EEMBC Benchmark Suite
Jason A. Poovey, Thomas Martin Conte, Markus Levy et al. · IEEE Micro · 2009
Cited by 228
Summer 2016
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), Paul M. Mendoza, USDOE Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Administration · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2016
Cited by 0Open access