preprint · ArXiv.org · 2025
Model selection for behavioral learning data and applications to contextual bandits
Julien Aubert, Louis Köhler, Luc Lehéricy, Giulia Mezzadri, Patricia Reynaud-Bouret
Cited by 0Open access
Abstract
Learning for animals or humans is the process that leads to behaviors better adapted to the environment. This process highly depends on the individual that learns and is usually observed only through the individual's actions. This article presents ways to use this individual behavioral data to find the model that best explains how the individual learns. We propose two model selection methods: a general hold-out procedure and an AIC-type criterion, both adapted to non-stationary dependent data. We provide theoretical error bounds for these methods that are close to those of the standard i.i.d. case. To compare these approaches, we apply them to contextual bandit models and illustrate their use on both synthetic and experimental learning data in a human categorization task.
Cite this paper
Aubert, J., Köhler, L., Lehéricy, L., Mezzadri, G., & Reynaud-Bouret, P. (2025). Model selection for behavioral learning data and applications to contextual bandits. ArXiv.org.
Aubert, Julien, et al. “Model selection for behavioral learning data and applications to contextual bandits.” ArXiv.org, 2025.
Aubert, Julien, Louis Köhler, Luc Lehéricy, Giulia Mezzadri, and Patricia Reynaud-Bouret. 2025. “Model selection for behavioral learning data and applications to contextual bandits.” ArXiv.org.
Aubert, J. et al. (2025) ‘Model selection for behavioral learning data and applications to contextual bandits’, ArXiv.org.
@misc{aubert2025model,
title = {{Model selection for behavioral learning data and applications to contextual bandits}},
author = {Aubert, Julien and Köhler, Louis and Lehéricy, Luc and Mezzadri, Giulia and Reynaud-Bouret, Patricia},
journal = {ArXiv.org},
year = {2025}
}Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.
Related papers
The neurobiology of categorization
F. Gregory Ashby, Matthew J. Crossley · Oxford University Press eBooks · 2010
Cited by 3
Two categorization patterns in idiom semantics
Гогичев Чермен Герсанович · Pragmatics & Cognition · 2016
Cited by 1
On the Reasons for Cognitive Differences During Categorization
Zuo Guang-ming · Science and Technology of West China · 2009
Cited by 0
Student identity – A membership categorization analysis approach
Gabriela Chefneux · Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov Series IV Philology and Cultural Studies · 2024
Cited by 0Open access
Is one object enough? Diagnosticity of single objects for fast scene categorization
Sandro Luca Wiesmann, Melissa L.‐H. Võ · Journal of Vision · 2022
Cited by 1Open access
Visual Search and the Collapse of Categorization.
J. David Smith, Joshua S. Redford, Lauren C. Gent et al. · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · 2005
Cited by 35
How Experience Affects Infants’ Facial Categorization
Jennifer L. Rennels, Andrea J. Kayl · Elsevier eBooks · 2017
Cited by 35