preprint · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2012

Interpolating point spread function anisotropy

Gentile, M., Courbin, F., Meylan, G.

Cited by 0Open access

Abstract

Planned wide-field weak lensing surveys are expected to reduce the statistical errors on the shear field to unprecedented levels. In contrast, systematic errors like those induced by the convolution with the point spread function (PSF) will not benefit from that scaling effect and will require very accurate modeling and correction. While numerous methods have been devised to carry out the PSF correction itself, modeling of the PSF shape and its spatial variations across the instrument field of view has, so far, attracted much less attention. This step is nevertheless crucial because the PSF is only known at star positions while the correction has to be performed at any position on the sky. A reliable interpolation scheme is therefore mandatory and a popular approach has been to use low-order bivariate polynomials. In the present paper, we evaluate four other classical spatial interpolation methods based on splines (B-splines), inverse distance weighting (IDW), radial basis functions (RBF) and ordinary Kriging (OK). These methods are tested on the Star-challenge part of the GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) simulated data and are compared with the classical polynomial fitting (Polyfit). We also test all our interpolation methods independently of the way the PSF is modeled, by interpolating the GREAT10 star fields themselves (i.e., the PSF parameters are known exactly at star positions). We find in that case RBF to be the clear winner, closely followed by the other local methods, IDW and OK. The global methods, Polyfit and B-splines, are largely behind, especially in fields with (ground-based) turbulent PSFs. In fields with non-turbulent PSFs, all interpolators reach a variance on PSF systematics $σ_{sys}^2$ better than the $1\times10^{-7}$ upper bound expected by future space-based surveys, with the local interpolators performing better than the global ones.

Cite this paper

APA 7

Gentile, M., Courbin, F., & Meylan, G. (2012). Interpolating point spread function anisotropy. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1210.2696

MLA 9

Gentile, M., et al. “Interpolating point spread function anisotropy.” arXiv (Cornell University), 2012, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1210.2696.

Chicago

Gentile, M., F. Courbin, and G. Meylan. 2012. “Interpolating point spread function anisotropy.” arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1210.2696.

Harvard

Gentile, M., Courbin, F. and Meylan, G. (2012) ‘Interpolating point spread function anisotropy’, arXiv (Cornell University). Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1210.2696.

BibTeX

@misc{gentile2012interpolating,
  title = {{Interpolating point spread function anisotropy}},
  author = {Gentile, M. and Courbin, F. and Meylan, G.},
  journal = {arXiv (Cornell University)},
  year = {2012},
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.1210.2696}
}

Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.