Skip to content
Free planNo credit card requiredStart writing
AI for Research home
AI for Research home
Dashboard
Sign inGet started

article · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · 1991

High frequency scattering from trihedral corner reflectors and other benchmark targets - SBR versus experiment. [Shooting and Bouncing Ray method]

J. Baldauf, Shung-Wu Lee, Luke Long‐Kuang Lin, Shyh‐Kang Jeng, Steven Scarborough, Chunrui Yu

Cited by 0Abstract and details only

Abstract

The index has no abstract for this paper.

Cite this paper

APA 7

Baldauf, J., Lee, S.-W., Lin, L. L., Jeng, S., Scarborough, S., & Yu, C. (1991). High frequency scattering from trihedral corner reflectors and other benchmark targets - SBR versus experiment. [Shooting and Bouncing Ray method]. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).

MLA 9

Baldauf, J., et al. “High frequency scattering from trihedral corner reflectors and other benchmark targets - SBR versus experiment. [Shooting and Bouncing Ray method].” NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA), 1991.

Chicago

Baldauf, J., Shung-Wu Lee, Luke Long‐Kuang Lin, Shyh‐Kang Jeng, Steven Scarborough, and Chunrui Yu. 1991. “High frequency scattering from trihedral corner reflectors and other benchmark targets - SBR versus experiment. [Shooting and Bouncing Ray method].” NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).

Harvard

Baldauf, J. et al. (1991) ‘High frequency scattering from trihedral corner reflectors and other benchmark targets - SBR versus experiment. [Shooting and Bouncing Ray method]’, NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).

BibTeX
@article{baldauf1991high,
  title = {{High frequency scattering from trihedral corner reflectors and other benchmark targets - SBR versus experiment. [Shooting and Bouncing Ray method]}},
  author = {Baldauf, J. and Lee, Shung-Wu and Lin, Luke Long‐Kuang and Jeng, Shyh‐Kang and Scarborough, Steven and Yu, Chunrui},
  journal = {NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA)},
  year = {1991}
}

Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.

Related papers