\nThe accountability cube: measuring accountability
Brandsma, G.J., Schillemans, T. · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · 2013
Cited by 0
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 10,000 papers for “Accountability”
Brandsma, G.J., Schillemans, T. · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · 2013
Cited by 0
Army Regulation · 2013
o Updates information (fig 13-1). o Updates approving authority and/or appointing authority definition (para 13-
Cited by 0
Wijnia, S, Waalewijn, P, Mandour, Y · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 1999
Cited by 0
John Rouse, George Davey Smith · Bristol University Press eBooks · 2017
Cited by 14
John Rouse, George Davey Smith · 1999
Cited by 0
Coper, Michael · ANU Open Research (Australian National University) · 2015
Cited by 0
giulia schneider · CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) · 2022
Accountability is regarded as a structural component of both public and private governance. It can be generally defined as the ability of decision makers to provide good reasons and justifications with regard to the decisions they have made in respect of the subjects that are impacted by their decisions. In the more theoretical reconstructions, accountability has two main components, respectively related to justifiability and answerability
Cited by 0
Mathias Koenig-Archibugi · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · 2017
Cited by 0
Jane, Williams · Cronfa (Swansea University) · 2013
Cited by 0
Dolph, Charles D. · DigitalCommons-Cedarville (Cedarville University) · 2014
Cited by 0
Bos, R. ten, Willemsen, H., Wind, P. de · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2015
Cited by 0
Flavine Meghy Mendes · Revista Publicum · 2018
O presente estudo apresenta resenha de estudo de Derick W. Brinkerhoff que se dedica à definição geral do accountabilitya partir dos seus componentes básicos e, com eles, uma tipologia simplificada, trazendo à tona opções estratégicas diretas e indiretas, que podem funcionar como instrumentos contínuos de aprimoramento da governança em coerência com os ideais democráticos. A escolha do trabalho de Derick W. Brinkerhoff se justifica porque ele contribui para compreender a lógica subjacente ao accountabilitye respectivas interconexões, envolvendo o domínio estatal e o público-privado, em seus diferentes desdobramentos na vigência do Estado Democrático.
Cited by 1Open access
2014
Cited by 0
University of Pennsylvania Press, Inc. eBooks · 2018
Cited by 0
Sada H. Shah · 2024
Cited by 0
2014
Cited by 0
Hayley Stevenson, John S. Dryzek · Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2014
International politics contains numerous accountability mechanisms, though they have rarely been thought of and analyzed in democratic, still less deliberative, terms (and this lack of attention is especially true of international relations scholars). Accountability, especially of empowered authority to actors and discourses in public space, is central to any deliberative system. This chapter interprets and evaluates accountability mechanisms in the global governance of climate change in a deliberative systems light. This analysis necessitates extending our imaginations beyond traditional conceptualizations of political accountability that work from an image (though not necessarily the reality) of what happens in a sovereign democratic state.
Cited by 0
Owen E. Hughes · 2017
Cited by 0
Kyle Kellum · PubMed · 2013
Cited by 0
Malcolm Anderson · Oxford University Press eBooks · 2011
Abstract This chapter deals with the issue of accountability of the police and gendarmerie in France since the beginning of the Third Republic. It begins with an overview of four types of accountability: managerial accountability, administrative accountability, legal accountability, and public accountability. It then discusses the effectiveness of systems of accountability in curbing police abuses and whether they provide effective remedies, along with the role of inspectorates in investigating misbehaviour by police officials. It also looks at the national commission for professional standards in security (CNDS), an external authority charged with investigating complaints against the police. The chapter concludes by assessing the police’s use of new technologies and their implications for accountability.
Cited by 0