Skip to content
Free planNo credit card requiredStart writing

Search 250 million research papers

Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.

About 10,000 papers for “Accountability”

Accountability

Wijnia, S, Waalewijn, P, Mandour, Y · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 1999

Cited by 0

Accountability

John Rouse, George Davey Smith · Bristol University Press eBooks · 2017

Cited by 14

Accountability

Coper, Michael · ANU Open Research (Australian National University) · 2015

Cited by 0

Accountability

giulia schneider · CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) · 2022

Accountability is regarded as a structural component of both public and private governance. It can be generally defined as the ability of decision makers to provide good reasons and justifications with regard to the decisions they have made in respect of the subjects that are impacted by their decisions. In the more theoretical reconstructions, accountability has two main components, respectively related to justifiability and answerability

Cited by 0

Accountability

Mathias Koenig-Archibugi · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · 2017

Cited by 0

Accountability

Jane, Williams · Cronfa (Swansea University) · 2013

Cited by 0

Accountability

Dolph, Charles D. · DigitalCommons-Cedarville (Cedarville University) · 2014

Cited by 0

Accountability

Bos, R. ten, Willemsen, H., Wind, P. de · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2015

Cited by 0

Accountability

Flavine Meghy Mendes · Revista Publicum · 2018

O presente estudo apresenta resenha de estudo de Derick W. Brinkerhoff que se dedica à definição geral do accountabilitya partir dos seus componentes básicos e, com eles, uma tipologia simplificada, trazendo à tona opções estratégicas diretas e indiretas, que podem funcionar como instrumentos contínuos de aprimoramento da governança em coerência com os ideais democráticos. A escolha do trabalho de Derick W. Brinkerhoff se justifica porque ele contribui para compreender a lógica subjacente ao accountabilitye respectivas interconexões, envolvendo o domínio estatal e o público-privado, em seus diferentes desdobramentos na vigência do Estado Democrático.

Cited by 1Open access

Accountability

University of Pennsylvania Press, Inc. eBooks · 2018

Cited by 0

Accountability

Hayley Stevenson, John S. Dryzek · Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2014

International politics contains numerous accountability mechanisms, though they have rarely been thought of and analyzed in democratic, still less deliberative, terms (and this lack of attention is especially true of international relations scholars). Accountability, especially of empowered authority to actors and discourses in public space, is central to any deliberative system. This chapter interprets and evaluates accountability mechanisms in the global governance of climate change in a deliberative systems light. This analysis necessitates extending our imaginations beyond traditional conceptualizations of political accountability that work from an image (though not necessarily the reality) of what happens in a sovereign democratic state.

Cited by 0

Accountability

Malcolm Anderson · Oxford University Press eBooks · 2011

Abstract This chapter deals with the issue of accountability of the police and gendarmerie in France since the beginning of the Third Republic. It begins with an overview of four types of accountability: managerial accountability, administrative accountability, legal accountability, and public accountability. It then discusses the effectiveness of systems of accountability in curbing police abuses and whether they provide effective remedies, along with the role of inspectorates in investigating misbehaviour by police officials. It also looks at the national commission for professional standards in security (CNDS), an external authority charged with investigating complaints against the police. The chapter concludes by assessing the police’s use of new technologies and their implications for accountability.

Cited by 0