Search 250 million research papers

Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.

About 10,000 papers for “Behavioral analysis”

Behavioral analysis

Cas Coopmans · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2022

Cited by 0Open access

Behavioral analysis.

Nobutaka Ohkubo (543874), Etsuko Matsubara (543875), Jun Yamanouchi (28385) et al. · Figshare · 2015

Five-week-old ZFP521Δ/Δ mice and ZFP521+/+ mice were used for all the analyses. (A–D) Open field test. (A) Representative locomotor tracks of ZFP521Δ/Δ mouse (right panel) and ZFP521+/+ mouse (left panel) during 60 minutes. Green dashed box, central area of open field. (B) Total distance of ambulation of ZFP521Δ/Δ mice (right bar) and ZFP521+/+ (left bar) mice during 60 min. Error bars indicate SD. n = 6. *, P<0.01, compared to ZFP521+/+ mice. (C) Time spent in central area. ZFP521Δ/Δ mice spent more time in the central area of the open field than did ZFP521+/+ mice during 60 minutes. Error bars indicate SD. n = 6. *, P<0.01, compared to ZFP521+/+ mice. (D) Open field test was repeated three times every 24 hours. ▴, ZFP521Δ/Δ; ▪, ZFP521+/+. Data represent mean ± SD. n = 6. *, P<0.01, compared to ZFP521+/+ mice. Note that the total distance of ambulation in the second test was significantly shorter than that in the first test for ZFP521Δ/Δ mice. (E–F) Elevated plus maze test. (E) Representative locomotor tracks of ZFP521+/+ mouse (left panel) and ZFP521Δ/Δ mouse (right panel) during 10 minutes. C, closed arm; O, open arm. (F) Duration time spent in closed arms, open arms, and central area. Error bars indicate SD. n = 6. *, P<0.05, compared to ZFP521+/+ mice. Note that ZFP521Δ/Δ mice spent more time in the open arms than did ZFP521+/+, and less time in the central area. (G) Cliff-avoidance test. The cumulative frequency of jumping was determined. n = 5. *, P<0.01, compared to ZFP521+/+ mice. Note that the cliff avoidance of ZFP521Δ/Δ mice was impaired. (H) Forced swim test. Immobility time was measured during the forced swim for 3 min. Data represent mean ± SD. n = 5 *, P<0.05, compared to ZFP521+/+ mice. Note that the immobility time of ZFP521Δ/Δ mice was shorter than that of ZFP521+/+ mice. (I) Prepulse inhibition test. The prepulse inhibition scores for each prepulse level were determined. Data represent mean ± SD. n = 5. *, P<0.05, compared to ZFP521+/+ mice. Note that ZFP521Δ/Δ mice displayed significantly reduced inhibition at 69 dB and 73 dB prepulse, compared with ZFP521+/+ mice.

Cited by 0Open access

Behavioral analysis.

S. Prasad Gabbita (803493), Ming F. Johnson (315757), Naomi Kobritz (803494) et al. · Figshare · 2015

Barnes maze testing was used to longitudinally examine the effects of IDT on learning and memory at 11.5 months (A-C) and 16 months (D-F) of age. Four days of training was followed 48 hrs later by a retention probe trial. There were no significant differences in average speed at either time point examined (A/D). At 11.5 months of age, all treatment groups were able to learn the location of the escape hole (B). Repeated measures two-way ANOVA of the acquisition phase revealed a significant effect of time (F3, 195 = 17.06, P < 0.001) and treatment (F4, 195 = 7.8, P < 0.001). NonTg mice performed significantly better than Con 3xTgAD mice (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001). One-way ANOVA of the 48 hr retention probe trial (C) revealed a significant treatment effect on memory retention (F4, 71 = 6.184, P < 0.0001). Low IDT treatment significantly improved spatial memory retention compared to Con 3xTgAD mice (*p < 0.05). NonTg performance on the probe trial was also significantly improved from Con 3xTgAD mice (***p < 0.001). Data represent mean ± SEM of n = 14-15/group. At 16 months of age, all treatment groups were again able to learn the location of the escape hole. Repeated measure two-way ANOVA of the acquisition phase (E) revealed a significant effect of time (F3, 126 = 17.06, P < 0.001) and treatment (F4, 126 = 11.65, P < 0.001). The interaction of Time x Treatment was significant (F12, 126 = 3.18, P = 0.005). NonTg and IDT treated mice had improved performance compared to Con 3xTgAD mice (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001). One-way ANOVA of the 48 hr retention probe trial (F) revealed a significant treatment effect on memory retention (F4, 43 = 4.538, P = 0.0042). NonTg and Low IDT mice performed significantly better on the spatial memory retention trial compared to Con 3xTgAD mice (*p < 0.05) with Med IDT mice also showing improved performance. Data represent mean ± SEM of n = 6-14/group. (G) Nesting behavior. Mice were given nesting materials and 24 hrs to build a nest. Nests were scored on a scale from 0–5. All IDT doses improved scores vs. Con 3xTgAD mice (***p < 0.001). Data represent mean ± SEM of n = 12–14/group.

Cited by 0Open access

Behavioral Analysis

Lasse Güldener · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2022

Cited by 0

Behavioral analysis.

Ni-Chun Chung (190225), Ying-Hsueh Huang (701547), Chuan-Hsiung Chang (130459) et al. · Figshare · 2015

(a) Locomotor activity for all groups measured during the first 120 seconds of the training protocol showed that the Cav3.2 knockout mice are as normal as their wild-type littermates. (b) The Cav3.2 knockout mice were impaired in retrieval of contextual memory tested 24 hours post the TFC training protocol. (WN: wild-type naïve group; KN: knockout naïve group; WT: wild-type training group; KT: knockout training group; * p<.05)

Cited by 0Open access

Behavioral analysis

Huanhuan Liu · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)

Cited by 0

Behavioral Analysis

Shivakumar R Goniwada · Apress eBooks · 2023

Behavioral analysis studies behavior patterns to understand why humans act a certain way. It involves collecting and processing behavioral data, such as online activities, social interaction, social behaviors, social media activities, Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, manufacturing machine behavior, and so on.

Cited by 0

Behavioral analysis.

Maël Lebreton (331693), Maxime Bertoux (475173), Claire Boutet (475174) et al. · Figshare · 2015

Left: Correlation between likeability rating and simulation richness (number of details reported per option). (A) Correlation across trials (data were binned into eight data points). (B) Correlation across participants (each dot is one subject). Right: Analysis of nonimpulsive choice rate (preference for the delayed option). (C) Nonimpulsive choice rate as a function of the difference in value estimates between immediate and delayed options. Differential values were individually calculated using hyperbolic discounting for every option, then binned into nine data points and averaged across subjects. Solid lines indicate model estimates using a softmax decision rule. (D) Intersubject correlation of nonimpulsive choice rate between monetary and episodic tasks. In all scatter plots, lines represent robust regression fits. In all panels blue and red diamonds represent data from Experiments 1 and 2. Error bars indicate intersubject standard errors of the mean.

Cited by 0Open access

Behavioral analysis.

Miguel Piñeiro (11841197), Wilson Mena (11841200), John Ewer (380470) et al. · Figshare · 2021

(a) Time-space diagram pattern that allows the identification of three different motor routines. The “AP axis” represents the anteroposterior axis, which is oriented so that the top of the diagram corresponds to the anterior side of the pupa. The color indicates the position of the midline in the left-right axis along the anteroposterior axis, with the top and bottom of the diagrams corresponding to the anterior and posterior sections of the midline, respectively. Darker colors indicate that the midline section is closer to the left side, whereas lighter colors indicate that it is closer to the right side. (b) Filtered time-space diagrams for 6 pupal recordings aligned to the time when the ecdysis phase began. White spaces in the top diagram correspond to times when the pupa moved outside of the microscope viewing field. (c) Time series of the mid-section of (b) (“LR axis” represent the left-right axis).

Cited by 0Open access

Behavioral Analysis

Steve Heinke, Kevin Trutmann · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2022

The data analysis reported in the paper

Cited by 0

Behavioral analysis.

Levy, David Mordecai, 1892- · The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association

Cited by 0Open access

Behavioral Analysis

2015

Behavioral analysis can be as simple as ABC: identifying antecedents, behaviors, and consequences. Behavioral analysis builds awareness of what comes before and what follows behaviors to understand the context that surrounds them. Behavioral analysis also provides a means of understanding and applying skills to emotions, cognitions, physiological events, and other factors that influence and result from target behaviors. Acceptance, nonjudgment, and validation surrounding target behaviors are required to build collaboration. Acknowledgment that clients are doing their best also fortifies collaboration and leads to the next step of educating clients about how behavioral analysis can assist them in reaching stated goals, properly orienting them to the benefits of the technique. The description of behavioral analysis as a “learning tool” to apply skills in the interest of what clients want is usually accepted by them.

Cited by 0

Behavioral Analysis

Sotoudeh Hamedi-Hagh · 2021

Cited by 1

Behavioral analysis.

Renaud Quertainmont (318796), Dorothée Cantinieaux (318797), Olivier Botman (318798) et al. · Figshare · 2015

(A) Locomotor scores as assessed by the BBB rating scale. MSC grafted rats reach significantly higher scores compared to both control groups. Only MSC transplanted rats reach the weight-supporting step level (score of 9). Injured + MSC vs injured only p = 0.0029; injured + MSC vs injured + vehicle p<0.0001. (B) Grid test scores assessing deficits in descending fine motor control. MSC grafted rats reach higher scores, significantly different from control rats. Injured + MSC vs injured only p<0.0001; injured + MSC vs injured + vehicle p<0.0001.

Cited by 0Open access

Behavioral Analysis

Houck, Max M. · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2018

Behavioral Analysis, the latest release in the Advanced Forensic Science series, an ongoing reference that grew out of recommendations from the 2009 NAS Report: Strengthening Forensic Science: A Path Forward serves as a graduate level text for those studying and teaching forensic psychology, and is also an excellent reference for forensic psychologists. Coverage includes investigations, death and violence, abuse, other methods and professional issues. Edited by a world-renowned, leading forensic expert, the Advanced Forensic Science series is a long overdue solution for those in the forensic science community.

Cited by 0Open access

Behavioral analysis (locomotion analysis).

Akira Fushiki (404750), Hiroshi Kohsaka (190642), Akinao Nose (190655) · Figshare · 2015

To measure larval propagation duration, we videotaped the animals’ behavior using a CCD camera (30 frames/sec for 30 seconds). We manually calculated the duration of waves (10 waves per larva) using ImageJ software.

Cited by 0Open access

Behavioral analysis data

Ryan Barker · Figshare · 2019

Behavioral data organized in wide format for analysis with JASP software.

Cited by 0Open access

Behavioral safety analysis

2000

Cited by 0

Automated behavioral analysis

Alba Lopez-Moraga, Laura Luyten, Tom Beckers · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2025

DeepLabCut and simBA models used to automate behavioral scoring and R scripts to facilitate data extraction. Only videos and .csv files to test validation of SimBA have been uploaded due to limited file storage in OSF. Feel free to reach out to us if you are interested in the rest of the data.

Cited by 0

Behavioral Safety Analysis

E. Scott Geller · 2024

Cited by 0