Scott Davidson · IEEE Design and Test · 2022
<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">This special issue of</b> <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">IEEE Design&Test</i> is about benchmarking machine learning (ML) applications. A special issue on benchmarking is long overdue. The last one I can find is one I edited way back in 2000. That issue covered the ITC99 benchmarks that I put together and introduced at a special session of the 1999 International Test Conference. These were used for comparing automatic test pattern-generation (ATPG) algorithms.
Cited by 2Open access
Angela Rossi · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
LLMs Benchmarking
Cited by 0Open access
Angela Rossi · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
LLMs Benchmarking
Cited by 0Open access
Thomas Sterling, Matthew Anderson, Maciej Brodowicz · Elsevier eBooks · 2025
Cited by 0
Pataki, Béla · Corvinus Research Archive (Corvinus University of Budapest) · 1996
A tanulmány ismerteti a benchmarking fogalmát, eredetét, kialakulását. Sorra veszi jellegzetes típusait, majd felvázolja folyamatának fő lépéseit. Bemutatja a benchmarking létjogosultságának gyakorlati bizonyítékát. Végül felhívja a figyelmet a bevált megoldások túlhajtásának csapdájára, az ún. Ikarusz paradoxonra.
Cited by 0
Žemličková, Olga · Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature) · 2001
Cited by 0
Zanette, João Paulo · Figshare · 2019
Test repo.
Cited by 0Open access
Christopher P. Chambers, Alan D. Miller · 2015
We introduce benchmarking, a method under which individuals are compared according to benchmarks, or important accomplishments. We show that benchmark rules are characterized by four axioms: transitivity, monotonicity, intersection dom-inance, and union dominance.
Cited by 0
Toxicology, Biomed Central, Julia-annik Börger et al. · 2008
Cited by 0
Tucher, F.W. von · Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) · 1998
Cited by 0
Eti İçli, Gülnur · Kırklareli University Institutional Repository (Kırklareli University) · 2019
In this article benchmarking subject is taken into consideration. Benchmarking is a comparison process which provides useful information for improving almost each business activity. It has got different kinds such as internal, comperative, functional benchmarking and business enterprises chooses one or some of them according to their aims to use. Today a lot of big business enterprises such as Xerox, AT&T and Motorola makes benchmarking study so as to remain standing.
Cited by 0Open access
Tucher, F.W. von · Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) · 1998
Cited by 0
van Eenennaam, F., van der Zwart, R.A., Traas, L. et al. · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 1996
Cited by 0
JISC Information Environment Repository (Jisc) · 2018
What are commercial alternatives? Have these changed since the project started? By University of the Highlands and Islands / Edinburgh Napier University \n \nThis article is part of the Institution as e-textbook publisher toolkit: \nhttps://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/institution-as-e-textbook-publisher-toolkit
Cited by 0
Gómez Niz, Raquel · Scientia Insularum Revista de Ciencias Naturales en islas · 2015
Cited by 0
Margit Ernenputsch · Publication Server of Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences (Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences) · 2013
Cited by 0
Zanette, João Paulo · Figshare · 2019
Test repo.
Cited by 0Open access
Deborah Anne Ondeck, Barbara Stover Gingerich · Home Health Care Management & Practice · 1998
Cited by 0
Alexander Kühne · Gabler Verlag eBooks · 1995
Cited by 2
Isabelle Bruno · 2021
Cited by 0