Commodity markets, commodity futures and international commodity policy
Gilbert, C.L, Queen Mary Coll., London (United Kingdom). Dept. of Economics · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 1992
Cited by 1Open access
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 10,000 papers for “Commodity”
Gilbert, C.L, Queen Mary Coll., London (United Kingdom). Dept. of Economics · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 1992
Cited by 1Open access
Wallis, W. Allen (Wilson Allen), 1912-, United States. Dept. of State. Bureau of Public Affairs. · The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association
Cited by 0Open access
Shaoxiong Chen · 1999
Cited by 0
Pablo Ahumada · 2016
This paper re-interprets Marx’s theory of the form of value in the context of his theory of the commodity. Building on the unresolved tension between Marx’s concept of value and the specific character of the labour constituting itself as value in his theory of commodity production, this paper argues that Marx’s is actually a theory of the mercantile form of value. Thus, it becomes evident that the process of realisation of material production in commodity production and the process giving rise to money are the same, and that they are only the material manifestation of the process of realisation of private and independent work as social labour. This characterises commodity production as the unity-in-difference of a material and a social moment, showing that Marx’s mercantile form of value is the conceptualisation of Adam Smith’s invisible hand. The paper also argues that Marx’s is not the theory of a money commodity.
Cited by 0
Wall Street Journal, institution · Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) · 1975
Cited by 0Open access
Wall Street Journal, institution · Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) · 1975
Cited by 0Open access
Joss Winn (17170273) · Figshare · 2024
This chapter discusses the peculiar nature of the ‘commodity’. I start by chopping the word down to its etymological roots and then reanimate it as the ‘commodity form’. In order to explain a single word, I have to introduce others: labor-power, abstract labor, socially necessary labor time and value. I then discuss the commodity of education, students as consumers and as producers. Finally, I conclude that the university (or college, or school) is a fetish that conceals the pervasive social power of the commodity-form.
Cited by 0Open access
Winn, Joss · Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) · 2020
This chapter discusses the peculiar nature of the ‘commodity’. I start by chopping the word down to its etymological roots and then reanimate it as the ‘commodity form’. In order to explain a single word, I have to introduce others: labor-power, abstract labor, socially necessary labor time and value. I then discuss the commodity of education, students as consumers and as producers. Finally, I conclude that the university (or college, or school) is a fetish that conceals the pervasive social power of the commodity-form.
Cited by 0
Agricultural Commodities Pesticides, Lois Rossi · 2007
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final rule is not a ‘‘major rule’ ’ as defined by
Cited by 0
2021
Cited by 0
David Punter · 2007
Cited by 0
James G. Carrier · The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology · 2018
Anthropologists often write about commodities in somewhat different ways and contrast commodities to different things. Underlying these differences is a common conception of commodities as things that are relatively impersonal, but different approaches define that impersonality differently and focus on different bases for it. These differences reflect three approaches. The first, and oldest, focuses on production and sees commodities as relatively impersonal with regard to the maker. The second approach focuses on circulation and sees commodities as relatively impersonal with regard to those who transact them. The third approach is different, for it is concerned with commodity as a cultural category and is concerned with what it is that people see as impersonal commodities.
Cited by 1
The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics · 1998
Cited by 0
Jeanann Verlee · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2017
Cited by 0
Christopher J. Arthur · 2022
Cited by 0Open access
Shaoxiong Chen · 1999
Cited by 0
Shaoxiong Chen · 1999
Cited by 0
Shaoxiong Chen · 1999
Cited by 0
Joss Winn · 2020
This chapter discusses the peculiar nature of the “commodity.” I start by chopping the word down to its etymological roots and then reanimate it as the “commodity form.” In order to explain a single word, I have to introduce others: labor-power, abstract labor, socially necessary labor time and value. I then discuss the commodity of education, students as consumers and as producers. Finally, I conclude that the university (or college, or school) is a fetish that conceals the pervasive social power of the commodity-form.
Cited by 0
Thrift, NJ · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) · 2000
Cited by 0