Construct validity
Marlies P. Schijven, J. J. Jakimowicz · Surgical Endoscopy · 2003
Cited by 119
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 10,000 papers for “Construct validity”
Marlies P. Schijven, J. J. Jakimowicz · Surgical Endoscopy · 2003
Cited by 119
Elfitra Desy, Surya · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Cited by 0Open access
Ian P. Stolerman, Lawrence H. Price · 2015
Cited by 0
2016
Why TASIT was developed Social skills deficits are common in many clinical groups, e.g. autism, traumatic brain injury, learning disabilities.
Cited by 0
Victor R. Preedy, Ronald R. Watson · 2009
Cited by 0
The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods · 2017
Cited by 0
The SAGE Dictionary of Statistics · 2004
Cited by 0
Ralph L. Piedmont · 2014
Cited by 11
Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics · 2007
Cited by 0
National Cancer Institute · Definitions · 2020
Cited by 0Open access
Peter Stoustrup (4956067), Christian Kerting Iversen (4956088), Kasper Dahl Kristensen (4956094) et al. · Figshare · 2018
<p>ANOVA tests analyzing inter-group differences between controls and three unique JIA groups. Level of significance p = 0.05. Secondary post-ANOVA tests were only performed for outcome variables in which a statistically significant difference was observed in the primary ANOVA test.</p>
Cited by 0Open access
Suyuan Peng (6641327), Jiawei He (3665995), Jiasheng Huang (6641330) et al. · Figshare · 2019
Cited by 0Open access
Encyclopedia of Research Design · 2010
Cited by 1
Encyclopedia of Evaluation · 2005
Cited by 1
Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods · 2008
Cited by 0
Kevin J. Grimm, Keith F. Widaman · American Psychological Association eBooks · 2023
Cited by 1
Keith A. Markus · 2025
Cited by 0
Cesar J. Rebellon · The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice · 2021
Content validity reflects the degree to which an empirical measure captures the full range of an attribute's potential manifestations. Direct measures reflecting the “gold standard” by which a given concept can be gauged are often expensive for researchers to obtain. Construct validity is related to, but distinctive from, two other major forms of validity: content validity and criterion validity. Appropriate measurement of a construct must therefore be inferred using indirect, but observable, indicators of the construct. Researchers sometimes divide criterion validity into two types: concurrent validity, and predictive validity. Whereas criterion validity can, in principle, be objectively established by comparing an indirect measure of a given concept to some gold standard, construct validity can never be definitively established. Using the logic of a multitrait-multimethod matrix, construct validity may be divided into two types: convergent validity and discriminant validity.
Cited by 3
The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods · 2004
Cited by 0
Michelle Newhart, Mildred L. Patten · 2023
Cited by 0