Domain analysis
Marianne Lykke · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2000
Cited by 0
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 10,000 papers for “Domain analysis”
Marianne Lykke · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2000
Cited by 0
Jacques Chevalier, Daniel J. Buckles · 2019
Cited by 0
Zhike Lu (194001), Zhongyi Cheng (194003), Yingming Zhao (194005) et al. · Figshare · 2015
<p>Proteins with acetylated lysines were aligned to the distribution of domains in the NCBI Conserved Domain Database using PRS-BLAST. Correction for multiple hypothesis testing was carried out using standard false discovery rate control methods, and domains with a corrected <i>p</i>-value<0.01 were considered significant. Domains with more than the number expected K-Ac sites were considered “overrepresented.”</p>
Cited by 0Open access
Elsevier eBooks · 1995
Cited by 0
Birger Hjørland · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2017
The domain-analytic approach to knowledge organization (KO) (and to the broader field of library and information science, LIS) is outlined. The article reviews the discussions and proposals on the definition of domains, and provides an example of a domain-analytic study in the field of art studies. Varieties of domain analysis as well as criticism and controversies are presented and discussed.
Cited by 0
Richard P. Smiraglia · 2014
Cited by 4
David Bawden, Lyn Robinson · Facet eBooks · 2018
If information science is to be taken seriously as a field of study, it is important that basic theories are formulated and examined in the field. Domain analysis is one serious attempt to consider the basic problems in IS. Anybody working in the field should care about the arguments that have been or might be raised for or against this view.Birger Hjørland (2010, 1653–4)
Cited by 0
Hjørland, Birger, Barros, Thiago Henrique Bragato · Lume (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul) · 2024
A abordagem analítica de domínio para a organização do conhecimento (e para o campo mais amplo da Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação) é delineada. O artigo revisa as discussões e propostas sobre a definição de domínios e fornece um exemplo de um estudo analítico de domínio no campo dos estudos de arte. Variedades de análise de domínio, bem como críticas e controvérsias, são apresentadas e discutidas.
Cited by 0Open access
Birger Hjørland · Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2017
The domain-analytic approach to knowledge organization (KO) (and to the broader field of library and information science, LIS) is outlined. The article reviews the discussions and proposals on the definition of domains, and provides an example of a domain-analytic study in the field of art studies. Varieties of domain analysis as well as criticism and controversies are presented and discussed.
Cited by 0
Margaret J. Davis, Harold G. Hawley · 2009
This paper &amp;scribes the reuse capability that Boeing has developed as one of the prime contractors on the US. Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) Sofrware Technology for Adaptable, Reliable Systems (STARS) pro-gram. The capability uses object-oriented and knowl-edge-based technology to support asset management and utilization and is being used on a joint U.S. NavylBoeing demonstration project for a flight instrument training sys-tem. The capability provides for retrieval and adaptation of both appropriate software artifacts and the processes for using them. Highlights from that experience are summa-rized relative to domain analysis and the BoeinglSTARS reuse capability. Two measures suggested by that experi-ence are defined: domain implementation complexity and domain implementation variability. Keywords:
Cited by 0
2014
semantic networks. This paper describes an advance in understanding the semantics of concepts and features in domain modeling for software reuse, incorporated into Organization Domain Modeling (ODM) Version 2. Previous approaches to feature modeling, such as FODA, use a single model with a particular semantics (AND/OR linkages, constraints) and a speciÞc feature typology. ODM V2 utilizes a multi-modeling approach based on Sigma, a mathematical formalism (developed at Synquiry) for reasoning about how multiple abstractions of sets of instances interrelate and combine to give a uniÞed understanding of a subject. Sigma deÞnes a number of semantic relationships that can hold between separate conceptual models linked into a
Cited by 0
Chaomei Chen · 2011
Cited by 1
Constantino Antonio García Martínez, Abraham Otero Quintana, Xosé A. Vila et al. · Use R! · 2024
Cited by 0
Yunsu Choi (11993484), Minah Han (4966984), Hanjoo Jang (11993487) et al. · Figshare · 2022
<p>Frequency responses of DBT images using FDK, deblurred images, and CBCT images for <i>f</i><sub><i>x</i></sub>-<i>f</i><sub><i>y</i></sub> plane (Top), <i>f</i><sub><i>x</i></sub>-<i>f</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> plane (middle), and <i>f</i><sub><i>y</i></sub>-<i>f</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> plane (bottom). (a) DBT images with FDK reconstruction, (b) deblurred images after Phase 1 and deblurred images after Phase 2 with (c) MAE, (d) PL-MAE, and (e) CBCT images. The display window is [1 4]. The red arrows indicate the missing data regions in the DBT images.</p>
Cited by 0Open access
Dominik Hajosi (17996284), Herwig Grimm (3398726) · Figshare · 2024
<p>(A) Histogram: Transfer of answers to research questions Q1/Q2 for each domain into scores. Answer options for Q1/Q2 are “Yes” = 1 score (maximum score = 2) or “No” = 0 score. (B) Radar graphs: Scoring of research questions Q1/Q2 for <i>implementation</i> and <i>operationalization</i> illustrated individually for each guidance document. Answer options for Q1/Q2 are “Yes” = 1 score (maximum score = 2) or “No” = 0 score. The inner square (highlighted in light blue) represents the extent of domain <i>implementation</i>. The outer square demarcates a domain’s <i>operationalization</i>. Q1: “Is the domain clarified/defined in the guidance document?”; Q2: “Does the guidance document provide a method for practically including the domain in HBA?”. H = Harm domain, J = Justification domain, O/B = Outcome/Benefit domain, EC = Ethical Considerations domain.</p>
Cited by 0Open access
Glenn Cowan · 2024
Cited by 1
J. Ted Dibene, David Hockanson · 2019
This chapter delves into the aspects of the load a bit more and analyzes the droop behavior of the power distribution network (PDN) for a number of the processor states that a high-performance silicon load may have. To begin with, it develops standard time-domain analysis in Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis and looks at the basic voltage droop of a system from close to the load all the way out toward the converter. Analytical methods for the time domain are somewhat different from the frequency domain. It is still true that the chapter looks for minima in the waveforms, but it also examines the effects with respect to the guardband and load line. After going through different load events that can cause voltage droops and understanding an analytical approach to the droop for the slowest event, the chapter examines some boundary analysis with respect to the PDN.
Cited by 0
Josef Macháč, J. Anthony Gomes · 1993
Cited by 63
Joseph V. Tranquillo · Synthesis lectures on biomedical engineering · 2014
Cited by 0
Laila Albughayl, Wilfred Beckford · Springer texts in education · 2023
Cited by 4