Skip to content
Free planNo credit card requiredStart writing
AI for Research home
AI for Research home
Dashboard
Sign inGet started

Search 250 million research papers

Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.

About 10,000 papers for “Domain engineering”

Domain Engineering

J. L. Diaz-Herrera · 2000

models provide basic modeling concepts in the domain, and include things like, reference requirements, product lines architectures, and specific problem solutions (e.g., patterns). Analysis models include artifacts such as object and data models, whereas design models include architectural representations, patterns, and frameworks. The solution models become reusable assets that serve as templates for the generation of the various work-products required during actual product development.

Cited by 0

DOMAIN ENGINEERING

Jorge L. Díaz‐Herrera · World Scientific Publishing Company eBooks · 2001

Cited by 3

Domain Engineering I Domain Analysis

Margaret J. Davis, Harold G. Hawley · 2009

This paper &scribes the reuse capability that Boeing has developed as one of the prime contractors on the US. Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) Sofrware Technology for Adaptable, Reliable Systems (STARS) pro-gram. The capability uses object-oriented and knowl-edge-based technology to support asset management and utilization and is being used on a joint U.S. NavylBoeing demonstration project for a flight instrument training sys-tem. The capability provides for retrieval and adaptation of both appropriate software artifacts and the processes for using them. Highlights from that experience are summa-rized relative to domain analysis and the BoeinglSTARS reuse capability. Two measures suggested by that experi-ence are defined: domain implementation complexity and domain implementation variability. Keywords:

Cited by 0

Simulation domain engineering

Roger Smith · ACM SIGSIM Simulation Digest · 1996

article Free Access Share on Simulation domain engineering Author: Roger Smith View Profile Authors Info & Claims ACM SIGSIM Simulation DigestVolume 25Issue 3Winter 1996 pp 3–5https://doi.org/10.1145/242745.242748Published:01 January 1996Publication History 0citation75DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations0Total Downloads75Last 12 Months2Last 6 weeks2 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF

Cited by 0

Domain-specific Engineering

Grady Campbell · 1997

The development of software today is a craft industry. In time, it will become a manufacturing enterprise based on an engineering discipline. One basis for this advance is an increasing standardization within many organizations of their software products and process to form coherent, market-focused domains of capability. Following a methodology of domain-specific engineering, these organizations are developing an ability to mass produce customized software to more effectively respond to the diverse and changing needs of their customers. This trend is most evident in the increasing commercial productization of defense industry systems by organizations worldwide.

Cited by 4

Keywords: domain analysis, domain engineering, concept

2014

semantic networks. This paper describes an advance in understanding the semantics of concepts and features in domain modeling for software reuse, incorporated into Organization Domain Modeling (ODM) Version 2. Previous approaches to feature modeling, such as FODA, use a single model with a particular semantics (AND/OR linkages, constraints) and a speciÞc feature typology. ODM V2 utilizes a multi-modeling approach based on Sigma, a mathematical formalism (developed at Synquiry) for reasoning about how multiple abstractions of sets of instances interrelate and combine to give a uniÞed understanding of a subject. Sigma deÞnes a number of semantic relationships that can hold between separate conceptual models linked into a

Cited by 0

Engineering Adaptive Applications:A Domain Engineering Framework

Dolog, Peter; id_orcid 0000-0003-1842-9131 · VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) · 2008

Applications on the Web are accessible for users with different background, technical environment used, political, social environment where they reside, interests, goals and so on. The different user types have slightly different requirements for features which such Web applications should have. The different requirements might be satisfied by different variants of features maintained and provided by Web applications. An adaptive Web application can be seen as a family of Web applications where application instances are those generated for particular user based on his characteristics relevant for a domain.In this book, we propose a new domain engineering framework which extends a development process of Web applications with techniques required when designing such adaptive customizable Web applications. The framework is provided with design abstractions which deal separately with information served by the Web application, environment used to deliver the information, and user characteristics which are observed and used to constrain the information and the environment selection.

Cited by 0

Engineering PDZ domain specificity

Young Joo Sun, Ernesto J. Fuentes, Maria Spies et al. · 2019

<p>PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1 (PDZ) domain - PDZ binding motif (PBM) interactions have been one of the most well studied protein-protein interaction systems through biochemical, biophysical and high-throughput screening (HTS) strategies. This has allowed us to understand the mechanism of individual PDZ-PBM interactions and the re-engineering of PBMs to bind tighter or to gain or lose certain specificity. However, there are several thousand native PDZ domains whose biological ligands remain unknown. Because of the low sequence identity among PDZ domain homologues, promiscuous binding profiles (defined as a PDZ domain that can accommodate a set of PBMs or a PBM that can be recognized by many PDZ domains), and context-dependent interaction mechanism, we have an inadequate understanding of the general molecular mechanisms that determine the PDZ-PBM specificity. Therefore, predicting PDZ specificity has been elusive. In addition, no de novo PBM ligand or artificial non-native PDZ domain have been successfully designed. This reflects the general challenges in understanding the general principles of PDZ-ligand interactions, namely that they are context-dependent, exhibit weak binding affinity, narrow binding energy range, and larger interaction surface than other protein-ligand interactions. Together, PDZ domains make good model systems to investigate the fundamental principles of protein-protein interactions with a wide spectrum of biomedical implications.</p> <p>My studies suggest that understanding PBM specificity with the set of structural positions forming the binding pocket can connect sequence, structure and function of a PDZ domain in a general context. They also suggest that this way of understanding the specificity will shed light on prediction and engineering of specificity rationally. Structural analysis on most of the available PDZ domain structures was established to support the principle (Chapter I). The principle was tested against two different types of PBM; C-terminal PBM (Chapter II) and internal PBM (Chapter III), and shown to support better understanding and design of PDZ domain specificity. We further applied the principle to design de novo PDZ domains, and the preliminary data hints that it is optimistic to engineer PDZ domain specificity (Appendix A and B).</p>

Cited by 0