Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · 2015
Witty, entertaining, and informative, this book on so-called 'false friends' will be of immediate use to anyone using the French language and needing to understand French society and culture. The individual entries have been carefully designed to carry the basic linguistic information required and then develop into a wider consideration of the social and cultural context within which the specific words and phrases are used in current French. As this title is supposed to be used in conjunction with and not instead of a dictionary, it also offers a brief list of recommended reading ranging from standard dictionaries to introductory works on French society and institutions.
Cited by 0
Christopher Whyte, Brian M. Mazanec · 2023
Cited by 0
Oxford University Press eBooks · 2023
Cited by 0
Daphna Buchsbaum, Christopher G. Lucas, Rebekah Gelpi · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2020
Cited by 0
Christopher G. Lucas, Daphna Buchsbaum, Rebekah Gelpi · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2023
Cited by 0
Daphna Buchsbaum, Christopher G. Lucas, Rebekah Gelpi · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2020
Cited by 0
Carter, Ronald · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · 1995
This U.S. Army briefing describes the new Army doctrine and the needed intelligence requirements that must be met to be able to effective conduct Information Warfare (IW) operations supporting that doctrine in the future. It discusses briefly the new ways that information is transmitted and the difficulty of attacking that information. The briefing focuses on IW exploitation in support of future Army operations.
Cited by 0
Andrea M. Matwyshyn · 2026
Over half a century ago, Hannah Arendt cautioned us to “think what we are doing” when we build new technologies. Engaging with her counsel and a set of historical case studies, this Article frames what it calls exploit machina problems. Exploit machina refers to situations where broken technologies and broken governance combine to irreparably harm the public. In other words, exploit machina involves organizational choices to knowingly leverage technology as part of legally problematic conduct, including various forms of fraud. In the language of data science, exploit machina situations implicate strategic decisions in building and managing artificial intelligence (AI); they involve, for example, data quality, predictive and prescriptive analytics, and corporate governance. However, reframed in the language of computer security, exploit machina problems are functionally experienced as a form of insider attack. When broken technologies and broken governance converge, untrustworthy insiders can leverage superior information about a technology (and its flaws) to exploit the public and our democratic processes. A portion of modern AI business models now reflect exploit machina dynamics. Using case studies of body-judging devices powered by predictive and prescriptive analytics, this Article argues that some AI implementations threaten to repeat legally problematic historical patterns of insider attacks on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Then, drawing inspiration from the technology theory of Arendt on cybernation, a form of destructive hyperautomation, this Article begins to reframe the legal and policy conversation around technology safety and exploit machina. It merges insights from data science and computer security theory with those from legal and policy scholarship around data analytics, data privacy, and AI governance. Specifically, this Article recasts technology safety in traditional legal terms — as a current problem where organizations knowingly or intentionally inflict irreparable harms on humans. As such, it rejects the dominant policy narrative of AI safety as a hypothetical future problem of machine supremacy. To combat exploit machina, this Article offers two concrete proposals. First, it introduces a set of (First Amendment sensitive) threat metamodeling techniques that expressly consider insider attacks and public safety. Second, after reviewing recent Supreme Court precedent, it proposes that Congress create a new technology regulator of last resort. The new agency would align existing governmental efforts in technology safety, fill regulatory and enforcement gaps in existing agencies’ enabling statutes and practical capabilities, and facilitate international cooperation. The new agency might be called the Bureau of Technology Safety.
Cited by 0
Oxford University Press eBooks · 2023
Cited by 0
Sushil Jajodia, Pierangela Samarati, Moti Yung · 2025
Cited by 0
Daphna Buchsbaum, Christopher G. Lucas, Rebekah Gelpi · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2019
Cited by 0
Daphna Buchsbaum, Christopher G. Lucas, Rebekah Gelpi · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2019
Cited by 0
Rob Shein aka Rogue Shoten, Marcus H. Sachs, Rob Shein · Elsevier eBooks · 2004
Cited by 0
Ari Ade Supriyatna, ade · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Cited by 0Open access
Rodrigo Cedeno · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Cited by 0Open access
Daphna Buchsbaum, Christopher G. Lucas, Rebekah Gelpi · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2020
Cited by 0
Rebekah Gelpi · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2019
Cited by 0
Rebekah Gelpi · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2019
Cited by 0
Daphna Buchsbaum, Christopher G. Lucas, Rebekah Gelpi · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2019
Cited by 0
Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · 2015
(A) In the modern application of the word the first syllable is unstressed, the second heavily stressed; here both syllables are stressed with the heavier weight generally falling on the second. The word has two principal meanings: a dangerous enterprise or an honorific, usually military, action. Th
Cited by 0