Incentive Motivation and Incentive Salience☆
Kent Berridge · Elsevier eBooks · 2016
Cited by 4
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 10,000 papers for “Incentive”
Kent Berridge · Elsevier eBooks · 2016
Cited by 4
Hridaya Raj Devkota (4694005), Emily Murray (3661438), Maria Kett (4216747) et al. · Figshare · 2018
Cited by 0Open access
Sulin Ba A, Andrew B. Whinston B, Han Zhang C · 2008
Cited by 0
George H. Miles · Public Administration · 1934
Cited by 0
Fogel, Al · Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) · 1975
Cited by 0Open access
Daniel G. Dillon, A Avram J. Holmes, A Allison L. Jahn et al. · 2016
Cited by 0
Hartman, Charles · Digital Commons - Connecticut College (Connecticut College) · 1984
Cited by 0Open access
Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)
Cited by 0
Liang Ningjian · 2024
Cited by 0
Mckercher, B · PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) · 2017
Cited by 0
Hartman, Charles · Digital Commons - Connecticut College (Connecticut College) · 1984
Cited by 0Open access
Liang Ningjian · 2024
Cited by 0
Ashkan R. Kian A, Ali Keyhani B · 2004
Cited by 0
National Cancer Institute · Definitions · 2020
Cited by 0Open access
Yibo Han, Yitao Han · Applied and Computational Engineering · 2026
With the wide application of blockchain in data sharing scenarios such as smart healthcare, the Internet of Things, and federated learning, how to maintain trusted collaboration and motivate nodes to continuously participate under the premise of privacy protection has become a key issue. The blockchain incentive mechanism builds a closed loop of "behavior - reward - continuous participation" through methods such as income rewards, reputation feedback and permission allocation, providing a reliable operation foundation for decentralized systems. This paper systematically reviews the relevant research in recent years based on the "incentive source structure" and "behavioral constraint logic", classifies the existing mechanisms into four categories: revenue-based, reputation-based, revenue-based and reputation-based, and rights-based, and conducts comparative analysis from aspects such as incentive processes, governance structures, and applicable scenarios. Research shows that a single incentive is difficult to balance efficiency, fairness and steady-state participation, while compound incentives have more advantages in enhancing incentive intensity, curbing free-riding and strengthening governance resilience. However, there are still challenges such as insufficient revenue confirmation, unstable reputation quantification and abuse of rights.
Cited by 0Open access
Carlo Cambini, Sara De Masi, Laura Rondi · SSRN Electronic Journal · 2013
Cited by 1Open access
Albert S. Thompson · Journal of Applied Psychology · 1954
Cited by 0
The Journal of Educational Research · 1945
Cited by 0
Martin Krzywdzinski · Oxford University Press eBooks · 2018
This chapter examines incentive systems in automotive plants in Russia and China. The point of departure here is the distinction between job-based systems, where the associated tasks are determined as precisely as possible for each job, and person-based systems, which assign tasks not to certain jobs but to certain competence or performance levels. While job-based systems are more typical for Russia, person-based systems prevail in China. The chapter then turns to variable compensation elements and performance reviews and examines how supervisors deal with performance appraisals. It reveals considerable differences between Russian and Chinese sites. The most notable difference concerns the use of performance appraisals. The Russian plants are characterized by a punishment culture that undermines the motivational effects of the incentive systems.
Cited by 0
Liang Ningjian · 2024
Cited by 0