Memory Span Tests
Humpstone, H. J. · PubMed Central · 1919
Cited by 0Open access
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 10,000 papers for “Memory span”
Humpstone, H. J. · PubMed Central · 1919
Cited by 0Open access
Isabelle Viaud‐Delmon, Frédéric Bevilacqua, Olivier Warusfel · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2007
cote interne IRCAM: ViaudDelmon07b
Cited by 0
Humpstone, H. J. · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · 1919
Cited by 0
Stephen Rhodes, Jason M Doherty · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2016
Cited by 0
Pauline R. Martin, Samuel W. Fernberger · The American Journal of Psychology · 1929
Cited by 37
John Sallis · Epoché A Journal for the History of Philosophy · 2017
Cited by 0
Jeffrey D. Karpicke, David B. Pisoni · Memory & Cognition · 2004
Cited by 51Open access
James S. Nairne, Ian Neath · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · 2001
Cowan assumes that chunk-based capacity limits are synonymous with the essence of a “specialized STM mechanism.” In a single experiment, we measured the capacity, or span, of long-term memory and found that it, too, corresponds roughly to the magical number 4. The results imply that a chunk-based capacity limit is not a signature characteristic of remembering over the short-term.
Cited by 22
Marcelo Fernandes Costa · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2025
Cited by 0
Shinichi Ichikawa · Japanese Psychological Research · 1983
Immediate memory spans of 82 students were measured through the recall of digit sequences and dot-in-matrix patterns. The reliabilities of both spans were very high, while the correlation between the spans was low (r=.209). In addition, the same subjects were given eight kinds of cognitive tasks (Word Relation, Maze, Addition, Shape Series, Anagram, Space Relation, Number Series, and Mental Rotation) selected from intelligence tests. The two spans were correlated with the performance of each task in different degrees. Results of the factor analysis showed that the digit span had a high loading value on the “verbal” factor, while the span with dot patterns loaded the “visuospatial” factor. It is suggested that the capacities of those verbal and visual immediate memory are independent to each other from the point of view of individual difference, and that they have distinct roles in problem solving.
Cited by 27Open access
George A. Talland · PsycEXTRA Dataset · 1964
Cited by 0
Michael J. Watkins · Memory & Cognition · 1977
Cited by 126Open access
El-Mir, Mohammed · Figshare · 2022
The current study attempts to trace the historical development of memory capacity evaluation, in addition to identifying the limitations of this capacity and the factors that determine it. Previous studies have shown that the accumulation of data collected by researchers in the psychology of memory has led to a better understanding of how human memory works, and this paves the way for more effective measures of memory capacity. This historical review derives its value from the fact that memory capacity has become an important variable in a large number of scientific works that examine the correlations between memory capacity and performance in a range of cognitive activities. It was clear from previous research on memory that tasks measuring its capacity were of great interest for psychologists given its valuable applied extensions. Some of the determinants of memory capacity are repetition, and the speed of information processing... As for the factors that affect memory capacity, we can mention the rate of decay of traces. As for memory capacity measures. Regarding the measures of memory capacity, based on the capacity of meaningless syllables we now have a large number of tasks that measure the capacity of different memory structures. However, despite the great development of the exploration of memory, there is still a need to elaborate more accurate measures which their sensitivity is not affected by the differences in the studied situations.
Cited by 0Open access
Michael A. Hauser · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · 2000
Cited by 10
Neville Moray, A. J. Reid · Psychonomic Science · 1967
Cited by 3Open access
Stuart Miller · PsycEXTRA Dataset · 1971
Cited by 0
Harvey A. Taub · Journal of Gerontology · 1973
Journal Article Memory Span, Practice, and Aging Get access Harvey A. Taub, PhD Harvey A. Taub, PhD 2Psychology Service, Veterans Administration Hospital, and Dept. of Psychiatry, State Univ. of New York, Upstate Medical CenterSyracuse 13210. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Journal of Gerontology, Volume 28, Issue 3, July 1973, Pages 335–338, https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/28.3.335 Published: 01 July 1973
Cited by 27
Aubrey Epstein · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · 1964
Research Articles| November 25 2009 Auditory Memory Span for Language Subject Area: Audiology and Speech , Further Areas A.G. Epstein A.G. Epstein Århus Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Folia Phoniatr Logop (1964) 16 (4): 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1159/000263013 Article history Published Online: November 25 2009 Content Tools Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation A.G. Epstein; Auditory Memory Span for Language. Folia Phoniatr Logop 1 April 1964; 16 (4): 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1159/000263013 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsFolia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica Search Advanced Search Article PDF first page preview Close Modal 1964Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements. You do not currently have access to this content.
Cited by 7
Jonathan Sprent, David F. Tough · Science · 1994
Differentiation of immature T and B cells in the primary lymphoid organs gives rise to a pool of long-lived lymphocytes that recirculate through the secondary lymphoid tissues. On the basis of their surface markers, T and B cells comprise a mixture of naïve and memory cells with differing life-spans. Immunization (and vaccination) causes naïve lymphocytes to proliferate and differentiate into effector cells and memory cells. Whether the survival of memory cells is innate or requires persistent contact with residual antigen is controversial. Resolving this issue may be crucial for designing optimal vaccines.
Cited by 392
El-Mir, Mohammed · Figshare · 2022
The current study attempts to trace the historical development of memory capacity evaluation, in addition to identifying the limitations of this capacity and the factors that determine it. Previous studies have shown that the accumulation of data collected by researchers in the psychology of memory has led to a better understanding of how human memory works, and this paves the way for more effective measures of memory capacity. This historical review derives its value from the fact that memory capacity has become an important variable in a large number of scientific works that examine the correlations between memory capacity and performance in a range of cognitive activities. It was clear from previous research on memory that tasks measuring its capacity were of great interest for psychologists given its valuable applied extensions. Some of the determinants of memory capacity are repetition, and the speed of information processing... As for the factors that affect memory capacity, we can mention the rate of decay of traces. As for memory capacity measures. Regarding the measures of memory capacity, based on the capacity of meaningless syllables we now have a large number of tasks that measure the capacity of different memory structures. However, despite the great development of the exploration of memory, there is still a need to elaborate more accurate measures which their sensitivity is not affected by the differences in the studied situations.
Cited by 0Open access