Skip to content
Free planNo credit card requiredStart writing
AI for Research home
AI for Research home
Dashboard
Sign inGet started

Search 250 million research papers

Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.

About 1,525 papers for “Nominalization”

Nominalization

Giulia Pedrini · Easy - plain - accessible · 2024

Cited by 0

Nominalization

Oxford University Press eBooks · 2020

Chomsky’s <italic>Remarks on Nominalization</italic> (<italic>RoN</italic>), published in 1970, has had an immense impact on syntax, and far reaching ramifications for phonology, semantics, and morphology. Among other major factors, <italic>RoN</italic>[R1] propelled the emergence of theoretical morphology as a distinct subfield within generative grammar. The original agenda set up by <italic>RoN</italic>, as augmented by supplemental work on argument structure, on the typology of derived nominals, and on the role of morphological complexity, continue to inform major contemporary theoretical approaches to morphosyntax in general, and to the study of derived nominals, in particular. This volume brings together contributions which address these issues from different perspectives and which, importantly, focus on a broad range of typologically diverse languages (Archi, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Gujarati, Hebrew, Hiaki, Icelandic, Japanese, Jingpo, Korean, Mayan, Mẽbengokre, Navajo, Polish, Romanian, Spanish, Turkish, Udmurt). The volume also contains an introduction by the editors as well as a short contribution by Noam Chomsky.&lt;153&gt;

Cited by 12

Nominalization

Yoko Hasegawa · Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2014

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Cited by 0

Nominalization

2005

This chapter contains sections titled: Two Types of English Gerunds History of the English Gerundive System Nominalizations Formalized I: Denotation Types Nominalizations Formalized II: Lexical Meaning Exercises

Cited by 0

Nominalization

Yutaka Satō, Sungdai Cho · 2023

Abstract Nominalization is a process of changing a verb or an adjective into a noun. Chapter 9 focuses on complement clauses with nominalizers. Complement clauses with two Korean nominalizers -kiand -(u)mand complement clauses with kes(a complementizer) are compared in regard to their syntactic structure, the morphological case of their subject (whether or not a genitive case is possible in place of a nominative case), and the presence or absence of a tense morpheme. Japanese nominalizers no, koto, and tokoroare compared regarding the semantic type of verbs that take them. All the Japanese nominalizers allow genitive subjects and only one of the Korean nominalizers, i.e., -(u)m, allows genitive subjects. An issue regarding genitive subjects and analyses proposed to account for the relevant phenomena, e.g., the D-licensing approach, are referred to at the end of this chapter.

Cited by 0

Nominalization

Winnie Zheng, Fan Liu, Yang Shen · Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics · 2016

Cited by 0

Niuean nominalization

Massam, Diane · Scholarship@Western (Western University) · 2018

Cited by 1Open access

Nominalization Exercises

Cicala, Domenica Elisa · Publication Server of the Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt) · 2019

Cited by 0

Quantifiers, nominalization

The COCOON platform (University of Paris) · 2013

The quantifiers in recordings 1-9 include many, few, different, any, all, every, and proportions. Transcriptions can be found in the Fieldnotes Book 2, p. 152-155.

Cited by 0

Adjectival Nominalization

David Conan Wolfsdorf · 2019

Abstract Chapter 6 focuses on the semantics and metaphysical implications of the semantics of the adjectival nominalization “goodness.” Adjectival nominalizations of the form “F-ness” are almost always mass nouns. The mass noun “goodness” derives gradability of a kind from the gradable adjective that it incorporates. So “goodness” is a gradable adjectival nominalization. Mass nouns are distinguished from count nouns on the basis of two semantic properties, called “semantic cumulativity” and “semantic divisibility.” The denotations of mass nouns are then interpreted in terms of the mereological structure of a join semi-lattice. The denotation of gradable mass nouns incorporate scalar as well as mereological structure. In the case of “goodness,” the elements at the base of the lattice structure are instances of goodness. An instance of goodness is a so-called qua quantitative trope, precisely one degree of purpose serving qua exceeding a second degree of purpose serving, where the latter is a standard of comparison.

Cited by 0

Nominalization and nominalization-based constructions in Galo

Mark W. Post, Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Harsta, Karen et al. · John Benjamins Publishing eBooks · 2015

This paper describes nominalization and nominalization-based construction in Galo, a Tibeto-Burman language of the Tani branch spoken in North East India. Nominalizers in Galo are divided into primary and secondary sets, while nominalization-based constructions are divided into two types: nominalized clauses and clausal nominalizations. Both primary and secondary nominalizers help form nominalized clauses, which are uninflected, exhibit a genitive subject, and enter into nominal complement and relative clause constructions. Clausal nominalizations are formed by primary nominalizers only, may be inflected, exhibit a nominative subject, and in general take on a more main clause-like structure and set of functions. Following this basic description, the diachronic origins of Galo nominalizers are discussed, and the Galo forms and patterns are situated in terms of a broader typology of nominalization in Tibeto-Burman.

Cited by 3Open access