Performativity
Ute Berns · 2014
Cited by 7
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 10,000 papers for “Performativity”
Ute Berns · 2014
Cited by 7
Jonathan M. Coker · 2021
Cited by 1
Music in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Encyclopedia · 2014
Cited by 0
Sagepub. Co. Uk/journalspermissions. Nav, Sonia Núñez Puente, Rainer Rubira García et al. · 2016
Cited by 0
Nina Tolksdorf, Friederike Schäfer · Open MIND · 2026
This curated collection approaches literature as a performative practice that actively builds and sustains temporal communities across time. It understands literature as something that happens in action (through transmission, performance and use) within dynamic networks of human and non-human actors. Focusing on performativity as both a methodological lens and a field of inquiry, the contributions to this curated collection explore how literature is continually rewritten, remediated and renegotiated in artistic, digital and interdisciplinary contexts.
Cited by 0
Simidele Dosekun · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · 2016
Cited by 0
Nina Tolksdorf, Friederike Schäfer · Articulations · 2026
This curated collection approaches literature as a performative practice that actively builds and sustains temporal communities across time. It understands literature as something that happens in action (through transmission, performance and use) within dynamic networks of human and non-human actors. Focusing on performativity as both a methodological lens and a field of inquiry, the contributions to this curated collection explore how literature is continually rewritten, remediated and renegotiated in artistic, digital and interdisciplinary contexts.
Cited by 0Open access
2012
Cited by 0
B B Hall, K F Gill · 1999
Cited by 0
Syska, Katarzyna, Kurant, Elena · Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) · 2019
Artykuł stanowi teoretyczną refleksję nad kategorią performatywności w tekście dramatycznym oraz próbę analizy performatywnych aspektów najnowszej dramaturgii rosyjskiej.
Cited by 0
Gary L.Anderson, Kathryn G.Herr · Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice · 2007
Cited by 0
Martina Leeker · transcript Verlag eBooks · 2018
Cited by 0
Dosekun, Simidele · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · 2016
Cited by 0
2024
Cited by 0
Kendall Gerdes · TSQ Transgender Studies Quarterly · 2014
Abstract This section includes eighty-six short original essays commissioned for the inaugural issue of TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly. Written by emerging academics, community-based writers, and senior scholars, each essay in this special issue, “Postposttranssexual: Key Concepts for a Twenty-First-Century Transgender Studies,” revolves around a particular keyword or concept. Some contributions focus on a concept central to transgender studies; others describe a term of art from another discipline or interdisciplinary area and show how it might relate to transgender studies. While far from providing a complete picture of the field, these keywords begin to elucidate a conceptual vocabulary for transgender studies. Some of the submissions offer a deep and resilient resistance to the entire project of mapping the field terminologically; some reveal yet-unrealized critical potentials for the field; some take existing terms from canonical thinkers and develop the significance for transgender studies; some offer overviews of well-known methodologies and demonstrate their applicability within transgender studies; some suggest how transgender issues play out in various fields; and some map the productive tensions between trans studies and other interdisciplines.
Cited by 21
Thomas Kaiserfeld · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Abstract Different perspectives on the intervention of social sciences in general and economic theories in particular as well as expertise in the formation of institutions, so called performativity, are discussed. In the field of institutional and technological change, the issue of scholarly work as opposed to activism has been discussed at length. The question is reflexive: whether different notions of technological and institutional change may contribute to a change of existing relations between technologies and institutions. There are of course important examples of this; one needs only to mention Marxism as both a theory and a political practice. The conclusion is nevertheless that technological and institutional change influences the forming of theories more than theories influencing policymaking and practices.
Cited by 0
Mooney, Susan · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · 2004
Cited by 0
Morrish, L · Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) · 2009
Cited by 0
Julie Rak · Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature · 2021
The concept of performativity is foundational to the study of gender, but arguably no concept within gender studies has been more misunderstood and misapplied. A journey through the development of performativity as a critical tool from its beginnings in linguistics and philosophy, to its foundational work in poststructuralism and then its general acceptance within the study of gender shows how and why the concept of performativity is at once obvious and difficult to grasp, connected as it is to ordinary life and speech and to abstract theories of identification, all at once. J. L. Austin proposed performatives as utterances that were not constative, in that they were not verifiable, famously arguing that performatives are illocutionary, because they “do” an action as they are said or written. Austin’s focus included the environment or scene of the utterance, where speakers and situation had to match the intent of the performative in order for it to work. From then on, performatives became the subject of linguistics and speech act theory, and then were important to many critical theorists, notably Shoshana Felman, Jean-François Lyotard, Jacques Derrida, and Judith Butler, all of whom developed postmodern and poststructural approaches to language and representation which saw that performatives offered an alternative route to thinking about how meaning is produced. Poststructuralists interested in the work of language and politics found performatives helpful for thinking about the impact and force of statements. Judith Butler, who in particular is associated with poststructural thinking about performatives, developed a theory of performativity which linked it to ways of doing gender. In her rethinking of performativity and gender, discourse and repetition construct a sense of what gender identity is. Performativity in Butler’s view explains how gender identity constructs subjects and then is connected (often falsely or painfully) to ideas about sex assignment, bodies and sexuality, although the constant repetition of gender norms can result in new and unexpected ways of being gendered. Performativity in Butler’s work is <italic>not</italic> performance, although it has been widely interpreted that way, because performativity does not assume that a subject pre-exists its discursive construction. The repetition and reiteration of gender norms provides a fiction of interiority and identity for subjects, although Butler leaves open the possibility of the remainder, or excess, that has political potential to make other kinds of gender identities. Performativity was hotly debated within feminist theory, queer theory, and trans theory because Butler’s version of the concept critiqued the work of agency while still insisting on the importance of politics. Eventually, the concept became central to non-essentialist approaches to identity formation.
Cited by 3
Derek McCormack · Elsevier eBooks · 2009
Cited by 4