Search 250 million research papers

Preprint PREPRINT

Stephane Padovani · 2004

Cited by 0

Preprint

Mitul Mehta, Barnby, Joseph M · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2017

Preprint

Cited by 0Open access

Preprint

Chelsea Sleep, Josh Miller, Donald Lynam et al. · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)

Cited by 0

Preprint

Anil Seth, Bence Palfi · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2018

Unravelling the mechanisms that trigger cognitive control is a central question in cognitive science. Cognitive conflict is closely associated with the activation of cognitive control, helping individuals to follow their own goals. In this study, we examined whether the association of conflict and control holds when people are not aware of their intentions (i.e., they experience involuntariness regarding their behaviours). To induce unconscious control, we employed a posthypnotic suggestion (word blindness: that words will appear as a meaningless foreign script) on highly suggestible participants, a manipulation which has previously been shown to halve the Stroop interference effect. To alter the amount of conflict, we manipulated the proportion of incongruent, congruent and neutral Stroop trials between blocks in two experiments. The analyses revealed that the Stroop effect was reduced by the suggestion in the high conflict conditions (conditions with 33% or more incongruent trials), and barely at all in the low conflict conditions (conditions with 10% incongruent trials) compared to no suggestion conditions, thus, supporting the idea that a certain amount of conflict is required to activate unconscious control. This finding can also be interpreted in light of the two competing accounts of the word blindness effect (de-automatisation of reading and response competition models). The results imply that conflict between the response options occurs even in the suggestion condition and so the word blindness suggestion does not influence semantic processing as the de-automatisation of reading account postulates, rather, it is more likely that the suggestion facilitates the reduction of response competition.

Cited by 0

preprint

kaifanxie · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2026

Cited by 0Open access

Preprint

Zanette, Andrea · Figshare · 2025

<b>"The Elastic Universe Theory (TUE) unifies gravity, dark matter, and cosmic expansion as elastic deformations of spacetime, achieving 99.99999998% reliability through rigorous tests. A groundbreaking vision of the universe."</b>

Cited by 0Open access

Preprint

Timothy Ballard, David K. Sewell, Niklas K Steffens · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2021

Cited by 0

Preprint

Miroslav Sirota, Marie Juanchich · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2018

Cited by 0

Preprint

Falk Lieder · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2022

Cited by 0

preprint

Valentina Rossi, Gilles Pourtois, Matthias M. Müller et al. · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2020

Cited by 0

PREPRINT

L. Suter, S. Glenzer, R. Turner et al. · 2000

Cited by 0

Preprint

Timo B. Roettger, Jennifer Cole, Daniel Turner · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)

Cited by 0

Preprint

Jeffrey R Stevens · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)

Cited by 0

Preprint

Martin Dechant, Marissa Verbokkem, Robin Welsch et al. · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2024

Preprint

Cited by 0

Preprint

Timo B. Roettger, Jennifer Cole, Daniel Turner · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2022

Cited by 0

Preprint

Sophie Gerdel, Sabine Bergner, Michelangelo Vianello et al. · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2024

This component contains all version of preprints uploaded on the OSF repository.

Cited by 0Open access

Preprint

Carsten Q. Schneider, Ingo Rohlfing · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2022

Cited by 0

Preprint

Timo B. Roettger, Márton Sóskuthy · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2022

Cited by 0Open access

Preprint

Barbara W. Sarnecka, James Negen, Jeffrey Rouder et al. · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)

Cited by 0

Preprint

Nick Buttrick, Timothy Wilson, Erin Westgate · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2019

Cited by 0