Search 250 million research papers

Pretext:

Princeton University Press eBooks · 2021

Cited by 0

Pretext

Eye and Brain · 1998

Cited by 0Open access

PreTeXt

Robert A. Beezer · Balisage series on markup technologies · 2018

PreTeXt is an XML vocabulary for scholarly documents. A key feature is the rigorous separation of presentation and content. This results in conversions to a variety of outputs, including print, PDF, HTML, EPUB, and Jupyter. While still under heavy and rapid development, it is stable enough to have been used for numerous textbook projects. We are also in a position to be able to report on aspects of its design and implementation.

Cited by 2Open access

Pretext

Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2008

Cited by 0

Pretext

Drew A. Swanson · 2023

Abstract This chapter explores several waves of public memory that shaped perceptions of North Carolina’s Reconstruction period in the decades following Governor Holden’s impeachment. Hearings before a Congressional Joint Committee established to investigate the actions of the Ku Klux Klan produced national perceptions of local lawlessness. Writers of fiction—most famously novelist, lawyer, and editor Albion Tourgée—further shaped popular understandings of the state’s Reconstruction era. The identities of Stephens’s killers remained somewhat mysterious, even as partial confessions from Conservatives like Frank Wiley and Felix Roan revealed more details of the crime. By the early twentieth century, professional historians, especially students trained by Columbia University professor William Dunning, were increasingly labeling Reconstruction an economic, political, and racial “tragedy.” This Dunning School interpretation was led in North Carolina by Joseph Grégoire de Roulhac Hamilton, and was disseminated through academic histories, school textbooks, civic speeches, and public monuments.

Cited by 0

Pretext

Harvard University Press eBooks · 2009

Cited by 0

pretext, v.

Oxford University Press eBooks · 2023

Cited by 0

Pretext pages.doc

Thom H. Gilbert · 2017

Cited by 0

Returning Pretext

Owens, Allan, Yamani, H. · ChesterRep (University of Chester) · 2017

Pretext Interactive Performance toured between January -December 2017 staged in Storyhouse Chester UK; Bethlehem University ,West Bank Palestine;

Cited by 0

Pretext introduction

Gabriela Matuszek-Stec · Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) · 2005

Cited by 0Open access

Pretext #4

Nayland Blake

Cited by 0

Returning Pretext

Allan Owens, H. Yamani · ChesterRep (University of Chester) · 2016

Pretext Interactive Performance toured between January -December 2017 staged in Storyhouse Chester UK; Bethlehem University ,West Bank Palestine;

Cited by 0

ARCH524 / Pretext :

Kapusuz, Bilge Beril · OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) · 2012

Discovery of the linear perspective of the Renaissance is momentous in terms of the appearance of a new “way of seeing” that is central to the “subject” and emergence of a “subjective” “way of representing” the world. With the assumption that “perspective” is a cultural constituent of the “Renaissance paradigm” that generates the representational notions of art and architecture, perspective is considered as a “convention” and a “mode of representation” that has been influential until the “paradigm shifts” in the nineteenth and twentieth century. With the influx of the modernist avant-gardes, “subjective” linear perspective is replaced with the “instruments” of the new paradigm, and “parallel projection” becomes the mere tool for the representation and production of art and architecture introducing a new “objective” structure. The aim of this study is to reawaken and reconsider perspective through the “conventions” and the “aberrations” it reproduces. In this context, the course in the curriculum of METU Department of Architecture entitled Arch524 Architecture and Different Modes of Representation is covered as a “pretext” for this study. The theoretical framework and the structure of the course has a great impact on this study, since the course reconsider Renaissance perspective and its architectural production in a new context; within the modern architectural space of METU Faculty of Architecture Building. Following the traces of the selective works from the final exhibitions of the course, creating “illusionistic spaces,” and recalling the subject “participation,” it is questioned how perspective is “exhibited” and how the architectural space is reproduced.

Cited by 0

Pretext 1972

College of Eastern Utah · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · 1972

Cited by 0

Pretext Index

Princeton University Press eBooks · 2000

Cited by 0

Pretext 1972

College of Eastern Utah · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) · 1972

Yearbook for the College of Eastern Utah 1972.

Cited by 0

pretext, n.¹

Oxford University Press eBooks · 2023

Cited by 0

Privacy as Pretext

Hazeldean, Susan · eYLS (Yale Law School) · 2019

The terms of the debate over LGBT rights have shifted in recent years, particularly since the Supreme Court made marriage equality the law of the land in Obergefell v. Hodges. Today, people against LGBT equality argue that curtailing LGBT rights is necessary to protect the rights of others. One potent rhetorical weapon used to oppose LGBT rights is the claim that antidiscrimination protections for LGBT people undermine privacy because they permit transgender people to use facilities that accord with their gender identity. This Article uses legal privacy theory to show that allowing transgender people into gendered facilities does not undermine privacy in any legally cognizable sense. In making this argument, I engage with the work of scholars who have developed various philosophical understandings of privacy thought to justify a legal right to its protection. Privacy has been conceptualized as: a "right to be let alone"; a means to limit access to the self; a safeguard of intimacy; a right to control information; a defense for personhood; and protection for social networks. But none of these conceptions of privacy support a right for cisgender objectors to exclude transgender people from facilities that accord with their gender identity. Indeed, examining the issue through these privacy theories shows that excluded transgender people are the ones whose privacy is violated. Opponents' privacy claims are just a pretext to justify rolling back antidiscrimination protections for LGBT people. I also show that accepting a privacy right to exclude transgender people from gendered facilities would harm all women and girls. The privacy arguments being made to oppose LGBT rights echo a troubling history of using privacy concerns to justify unequal treatment of women. They also reify negative stereotypes about men and women, undermining sex equality and making all people more vulnerable to discrimination, mistreatment, and assault.

Cited by 0Open access

Propaganda and pretext

Sidney J. Holt · Marine Pollution Bulletin · 2006

Cited by 1

Chapter 3. Pretext

Geoffrey B. Robinson · Princeton University Press eBooks · 2018

Cited by 0