Readability
John G. Johnson · The Physics Teacher · 1979
First Page
Cited by 0
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 10,000 papers for “Readability”
John G. Johnson · The Physics Teacher · 1979
First Page
Cited by 0
Marco Masoni, Maria Renza Guelfi · Florence Research (University of Florence) · 2018
Articolo pubblicato sulla rivista La Professione, facente parte del libro "La Medicina in rete" di Marco Masoni e Maria Renza Guelfi
Cited by 0Open access
McPhee, Linda · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · 2001
Cited by 0Open access
2010
Cited by 1
Martin H. Weik · 2000
Cited by 0
Bob Papper, Janet Kolodzy · 2024
Cited by 0
Adrian Wallwork · 2016
Cited by 0
Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology (BCIO) · Definitions · 2023
Definition: An attribute of a text used in communication process, concerning the ease of understanding the wording or other qualitative aspects of the text that facilitate comprehension.This definition was imported from the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology (see https://bciosearch.org/).Comments and suggestions for improvements are welcome using the Qeios review system.Definitions imported from the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology (BCIO) are what are known as 'ontological definitions'.See this article in Qeios for an explanation https://www.qeios.com/read/YGIF9B. Ontological definitions can sometimes be hard to read. In those cases we also include an informal definition.Definitions also often require elaboration to make it clear how they should be used and what they include.In those cases we include a comment.Also, definitions sometimes require an explanation as to how they came about to help users understand how they relate to alternative definitions.In those cases we include a curator note.
Cited by 0Open access
2015
Broadcast news writing involves not only the basic elements of all good writing but also a number of conventions and peculiarities of its own.“Literature is the art of writing something that will be read twice,” wrote British writer Cyril Connolly; “journalism what will be grasped at once.” And in broadcast, it must be grasped via the ear.
Cited by 0
M. Cynthia Logsdon, Marianne H. Hutti · MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing · 2006
Readability is an important consideration in the choice of depression-screening instruments and written materials for consumers. Nurses using any of the four postpartum screening instruments studied can feel confident that women who can read will be able to read them. The readability of a book, pamphlet, or instrument should be of concern to nurses who work with women during the postpartum period.
Cited by 25
Yvette M. d’Entremont · 2014
Cited by 0
2003
Cited by 0
Adrian Wallwork · English for academic research · 2023
Cited by 0Open access
The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation · 2018
Cited by 0
2016
Software readability is introduced, including best practices to facilitate clear syntax; modular design; and standardization of code structure, naming conventions, program headers, and comments. Standardization techniques are demonstrated that can facilitate automated parsing of code to create software technical documentation, such as risk registers, reuse libraries, and reuse catalogs. Symbolism in software that can enable faster identification of software defects and deficits is demonstrated.
Cited by 0
Martin Fenner · Front Matter · 2021
Readability is obviously important for any kind of scholarly communication, from writing papers to blog posts. I have written about scientific writing before (e.g. Scientific writers can help publish good papers, Books about Science Writing, Do you know the Flesch score of your papers?), and writing scholarly content that is understandable is something that can be taught and learned.
Cited by 0Open access
莊淇銘; Chung, Chi-ming; Youn-jon · 1990
補正完畢
Cited by 0
Oxford University Press eBooks · 2023
Cited by 0
Norman A. Govoni · Dictionary of Marketing Communications · 2004
Cited by 4
Annette N. Shelby · Management Communication Quarterly · 1992
The legitimacy and methodology of using statistical measures to assess the readability of documents has been widely debated in the business and management communication literature. This article identifies major philosophical, methodological, and pedagogical issues in the controversy and explores their implications for using numerical readability measures to assess written documents. The central philosophical issue that the article addresses relates to the “appropriate” role of scientific inquiry in rhetoric. The second issue has to do with the variables readability indexes measure. Is length a sufficient and satisfactory factor in explaining reading difficulty? Finally, the article examines the pedagogical implications of using readability formulas to teach style and suggests a tentative research agenda.
Cited by 11