Skip to content
Free planNo credit card requiredStart writing
AI for Research home
AI for Research home
Dashboard
Sign inGet started

Search 250 million research papers

Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.

About 10,000 papers for “Reputation”

Corporate reputation and reputation risk

Christian Eckert · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics

Purpose - The corporate reputation of a firm and reputation risk is becoming increasingly important because of the rise of social media and the ongoing globalization. While defining and measuring corporate reputation and reputation risk represent the first steps in corporate reputation (risk) management, there is no general agreement in defining and measuring these two terms. Hence, this paper aims to give an overview of the existing literature in this regard, discuss it with respect to the operability in corporate reputation (risk) management and, based on this, present a holistic and consistent approach to define and measure corporate reputation and reputation risk. Design/methodology/approach - The paper gives an overview of the literature regarding definitions and measurement methods of corporate reputation and reputation risk. Moreover, it discusses such definitions and measurement methods with respect to the operability in corporate reputation (risk) management. Findings - Based on an overview of the literature regarding definitions and measurement methods of corporate reputation and reputation risk, the authors present a holistic and consistent approach to define and measure corporate reputation and reputation risk. Originality/value - The authors present an holistic and consistent approach to define and measure corporate reputation and reputation risk with focus on (risk) management purposes.

Cited by 0

Corporate reputation and reputation risk

Christian Eckert · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics

Purpose - The corporate reputation of a firm and reputation risk is becoming increasingly important because of the rise of social media and the ongoing globalization. While defining and measuring corporate reputation and reputation risk represent the first steps in corporate reputation (risk) management, there is no general agreement in defining and measuring these two terms. Hence, this paper aims to give an overview of the existing literature in this regard, discuss it with respect to the operability in corporate reputation (risk) management and, based on this, present a holistic and consistent approach to define and measure corporate reputation and reputation risk. Design/methodology/approach - The paper gives an overview of the literature regarding definitions and measurement methods of corporate reputation and reputation risk. Moreover, it discusses such definitions and measurement methods with respect to the operability in corporate reputation (risk) management. Findings - Based on an overview of the literature regarding definitions and measurement methods of corporate reputation and reputation risk, the authors present a holistic and consistent approach to define and measure corporate reputation and reputation risk. Originality/value - The authors present an holistic and consistent approach to define and measure corporate reputation and reputation risk with focus on (risk) management purposes.

Cited by 0

Corporate reputation and reputation risk

Christian Eckert · The Journal of Risk Finance · 2017

Purpose The corporate reputation of a firm and reputation risk is becoming increasingly important because of the rise of social media and the ongoing globalization. While defining and measuring corporate reputation and reputation risk represent the first steps in corporate reputation (risk) management, there is no general agreement in defining and measuring these two terms. Hence, this paper aims to give an overview of the existing literature in this regard, discuss it with respect to the operability in corporate reputation (risk) management and, based on this, present a holistic and consistent approach to define and measure corporate reputation and reputation risk. Design/methodology/approach The paper gives an overview of the literature regarding definitions and measurement methods of corporate reputation and reputation risk. Moreover, it discusses such definitions and measurement methods with respect to the operability in corporate reputation (risk) management. Findings Based on an overview of the literature regarding definitions and measurement methods of corporate reputation and reputation risk, the authors present a holistic and consistent approach to define and measure corporate reputation and reputation risk. Originality/value The authors present an holistic and consistent approach to define and measure corporate reputation and reputation risk with focus on (risk) management purposes.

Cited by 86

Reputation∗

Firm Reputation, Doh-shin Jeon, Joel Shapiro et al. · 2004

This paper studies how firms make layoff decisions in the presence of adverse shocks. In this uncertain environment, workers ’ expecta-tions about their job security affect their on-the-job performance. This productivity effect of job insecurity forces firms to strike a balance be-tween laying off redundant workers and maintaining survivors ’ com-mitment when deciding on the amount and timing of downsizing. This framework offers an explanation of conservative employment practices (such as zero or reduced layoffs) based on firms having private infor-mation about their future profits. High retention rates and wages can signal that the firm has a bright future, boosting workers ’ confidence. Moreover, the model provides clear predictions about when waves of downsizing will occur as opposed to one-time massive cuts.

Cited by 0

Reputation

Cripps, M.W. · UCL Discovery (University College London) · 2008

We explain what reputation effects are, how they arise and the factors that limit or strengthen them.

Cited by 0

REPUTATION

Randall S. Kroszner, Thomas Stratmann, Randall S. Kroszner et al. · 2004

Are politicians who follow a strategy of reputational development rewarded with high levels of corporate campaign contributions? Reputational clarity could help to reduce uncertainty about a candidate and lead to high campaign contributions from favored interests. Alternatively, such clarity could alienate those who disagree and not permit the politician to obtain contributions from groups on both sides of an issue. We outline an approach that considers conditions under which a politician would and would not prefer reputational development and policy-stance clarity and consistency in the context of repeat dealing with special interests. Our proxy for reputational development is the percent of repeat givers to a legislator. Using data on corporate political action committee contributions (PACs) to members of the U.S. House during the seven electoral cycles from 1983/84 to 1995/96, we explore a variety of alternative hypotheses and find that

Cited by 0

Reputation

University of Wisconsin Digital Collections (University of Wisconsin) · 1924

Cited by 0

Reputation

Martin W. Cripps · The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics · 2008

Cited by 0

Reputation

Martin W. Cripps · The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics · 2018

We explain what reputation effects are, how they arise and the factors that limit or strengthen them.

Cited by 0

Reputation

María‐José Canel, Vilma Luoma‐aho · 2018

This chapter addresses the reputation of public sector organizations and its significance for closing the gap between citizens and public sector organizations. The reputation of public sector organizations is different from that of business organizations, and this places restrictions on reputation management. The chapter discusses how public sector reputation is constructed over time. It provides some key insights into how reputation can be measured and how it can become a valuable intangible asset for public sector organizations. The many effects that digitalization has had on the public sector are both good and bad. The chapter explores the benefits of a good reputation. Reputation measurement is always dependent on the organizational goals, values, and mission, as measurement is about seeing if the set aims have been reached. The chapter also provides two examples of measuring reputation. It expresses that the value of organizational reputation as an intangible asset in the public sector.

Cited by 0

Reputation

De Filippi, Primavera · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics

Reputation in a blockchain-based system is a digital representation of an entity's standing or status in a specific domain.

Cited by 0

Reputation

Allan Hepburn · Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2026

Cited by 0

Reputation

K.K. DuVivier · Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) · 2004

Whenever you send our a piece of paper or, nowadays, an email, your reputation flutters or flickers on the words you write. Perhaps you have an engaging presence or you are a crack litigator in the courtroom. Perhaps your tech department can help you use multimedia to make innovative presentations. Still, ninety percent of what lawyers do is writing. Be vigilant about what your writing is saying to others about you.

Cited by 0

Reputation

Pat Barclay · 2015

Abstract Humans—like many other organisms—observe others' interactions to gain useful information about who to challenge, avoid, mate with, or cooperate with. Organisms thus benefit from a reputation for being both able and willing to confer benefits on allies and impose costs on competitors. In humans, the existence of language allows for greater spread of information, and has increased the effects that one's reputation has on one's desirability as a partner or fearsomeness as a competitor. This has created selection pressures for high levels of both cooperation and aggression, as well as for behaviors that function to enhance one's own reputation (or decrease the reputation of one's competitors). A better understanding of reputation will allow us to harness social pressures to promote cooperation and decrease aggression, and help build a more comprehensive science of reputation.

Cited by 11