Moti Frank · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
This article deals with the question what distinguishes “engineering systems thinking” from “systems thinking”? Based on research findings, Senge's systems thinking laws were “adapted” to the “engineering systems thinking”—some were substantially modified, some replaced, and in some only the phrasing was changed. In addition, new laws were added. Thirty “engineering systems thinking” laws are suggested. The first stage in the development of an engineering curriculum is the analysis of the graduate's activities (qualification upon graduation). Therefore, on the practical level, based on the 30 laws, one could design curriculum for constructing “engineering systems thinking” and show on which learning theories or combination of theories should the learning environment be based. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Syst Eng 3: 163–168, 2000
Cited by 0
Fuenmayor Arocha, Ramsés Leonardo · Actualidad Contable FACES · 1997
Invited position paper for the "UKSS Workshop: Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice". Lincoln University. 9 January 1997.\n\nThis article was published in Systemist, Vol 11, Nº 5, 1998; pp. 483-502.
Cited by 0Open access
IWA Publishing eBooks · 2022
During the last two decades, the interrelationship between water and energy has become recognized. Likewise, the couplings to food and agriculture are getting increasingly obvious and alarming. In the last year, a record number of extreme weather events have been reported from most parts of the world. This is a visible demonstration how consequences of climate change must be understood and alleviated. The impacts of economics, lifestyle, and alarming inequalities are becoming increasingly recognisable. If the wealthy part of the world is not willing not make radical changes it does not matter what the less wealthy half of the global population will do to meet the climate and resource crisis.The purpose of the book is to demonstrate and describe how climate change, water, energy, food, and lifestyle are closely depending on each other. It is not sufficient to handle one discipline isolated from the others. This is the traditional “component view”. The book defines and describes a systems view. The communications and relationships between the “components” have to be described and recognized. Consequently, the development of one discipline must be approached from a systems perspective. At the same time, the success of the systems perspective depends on the degree of knowledge of the individual parts or disciplines. The catchphrase of systems thinking has been caught in the phrase, “The whole is more than the sum of its parts”. The idea is not new: the origin of this phrase is to be found already in Aristotle's Metaphysics more than 2300 years ago.The text may serve as an academic text (in engineering, economics, and environmental science) to introduce senior undergraduate and graduate students into systems thinking. Too often education encourages a “silo” thinking. Current global challenges can't be solved in isolation; they depend on each other. For example, water professionals should have a basic understanding of energy issues. Energy professionals ought to understand the dependency on water. Economic students should learn more how economy depends on natural resources like energy and water. Economics must include the environmental impact and ecological ceiling of economic activities.ISBN: 9781789062892 (print)ISBN: 9781789062908 (eBook)ISBN: 9781789062915 (ePUB)
Cited by 0Open access
Hans G. Daellenbach, Donald C. McNickle · Management Science · 2005
Cited by 8
John Boardman, Brian Sauser · 2008
By examining the links and interactions between elements of a system, systems thinking is becoming increasingly relevant when dealing with global challenges, from terrorism to energy to healthcare. Addressing these seemingly intractable systems problems in our society, Systems Thinking: Coping with 21st Century Problems focuses on the inhere
Cited by 195
2012
Cited by 0
Scott Jackson, Ricardo Moraes · 2023
Cited by 0
Michael C. Jackson · 2024
This chapter begins by setting out the challenge faced by Systems Thinking (ST) if it is to provide a complementary approach to that of science. In essence, it needs to find ways of addressing issues of organised complexity . The nature of organised complexity is explored and consideration is given to the ‘wicked problems’ that it produces. ST offers two ways forward in the face of organised complexity. The first seeks general systems laws that are applicable to all forms of organised complexity – whether physical, biological, human or social. This is the route favoured in Bogdanov's ‘tektology’, in ‘general systems theory’ (GST) and in cybernetics and ‘complexity theory’. It has not been as productive as was hoped, because ‘organisation’ takes on different characteristics at higher levels of complexity. There are emergent properties at these levels, producing behaviour that is only partially explainable using the theories and models applicable at lower levels. Boulding proposed an alternative way forward which gives recognition to emergence. This involves making the best possible use of models relevant to lower levels while developing new systems approaches which take into account the emergent properties at higher levels. ST has had greater success following this second route and has developed a range of systems methodologies that offer proven ways of engaging with organised complexity
Cited by 1Open access
Scott T. Davis, Hiroshi Sasaki · 2023
Cited by 0
S. Strijbos, C. Mitcham · VU Research Portal · 2005
Cited by 0
Checkland, Peter · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · 1999
Cited by 0
Nghiyalwa, Hilma · UNAM Scholarly Repository (University of Namibia) · 2019
Cited by 0
Engi, Dennis · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2020
Cited by 0Open access
Çağlar Güven · 2011
Cited by 0Open access
J. with MacNicol Sanders · Open MIND · 2023
Cited by 0
2025
Cited by 0
2022
Cited by 0
2012
This chapter focuses on business analysis through the lens of systems thinking. One of the basic principles of systems thinking is feedback. Many Business Intelligence--centric organizations are built around information. The problems arise when information is seen as a static state. Systems thinking applies systems theory to create desired outcomes or change. It offers a unique approach to problem solving that views problems as part of an overall system. Traditional problem-solving approaches tend to focus on one or a few parts of a system, believing that changes to those parts offer a solution. The systems-thinking approach focuses less on the parts and more on interactions and influences among them as the core elements of problem solving. Visually representing system behavior is widely practiced in systems thinking with a causal loop diagram (CLD). Causal loop diagramming is a form of cause and effect modeling. The diagrams represent systems and their behaviors as a collection of nodes and links. Nodes represent the things in a system, and links illustrate interactions and influences. The discipline of systems thinking includes several archetypes—generic models that represent recurrent patterns in systems—discussed in the chapter.
Cited by 0
Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals · 2021
Cited by 0
S. Strijbos · Oxford University Press eBooks · 2017
Abstract Systems thinking was launched by Ludwig von Bertalanffy and others in the 1950s as an interdisciplinary movement with a broad and bold scientific program. The movement attempts to overcome the dominating mechanistic world picture and related reductionism in the sciences which is regarded as one of the main causes of the problems of the modern world. This chapter discusses the sixty-year history of systems thinking and sketches some main lines of its three domains: systems science, systems approach in technology and management, and systems philosophy. This interdisciplinary movement has stimulated fruitful theory formation in the first mentioned domain, although it has not succeeded in achieving its original far-reaching goals. Furthermore, integrative, interdisciplinary systems approaches in technology and management have become well accepted. Finally, recent developments signal a return to the intellectual-spiritual roots of the systems movement aiming for a renewal of its scientific agenda.
Cited by 8