Foundations-Foundations NEH etc
Cited by 0
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 10,000 papers for “foundations”
Cited by 0
Amarjit Singh, Ishmael J. Baksh, Faculty Of Education · 2014
iContents Preface............................................................................................... viii-ix Introduction......................................................................................... x Acknowledgments.............................................................................. xi
Cited by 0
Malte Elson, James D. Ivory, Jessica C Hotter et al. · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2020
The Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) has drawn significant interest from the popular press and academics alike. One of its primary constituting methodologies is the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ), a self-report instrument aimed to assess the use of five sets of moral intuitions when making moral judgments. The proposed universality and moduliarity of both MFT and MFQ have been challenged conceptually and empirically. We examine the scale’s development and offer a systematic content analysis of 539 scholarly works using the MFQ to estimate its overall reliability. Altogether, 612% of the studies reported Cronbach’s alpha as an indicator for reliability (38% reported no reliability estimate at all). Mean Cronbach’s alpha scores for four of the five subscales were below .70. We discuss implications for the measurement of moral foundations and the evidentiary basis of Moral Foundations Theory.
Cited by 0
Jordan Wolf, Dan Tamul, Jessica C Hotter et al. · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2022
The Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) has drawn significant interest from the popular press and academics alike. One of its primary constituting methodologies is the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ), a self-report instrument aimed to assess the use of five sets of moral intuitions when making moral judgments. The proposed universality and moduliarity of both MFT and MFQ have been challenged conceptually and empirically. We examine the scale’s development and offer a systematic content analysis of 539 scholarly works using the MFQ to estimate its overall reliability. Altogether, 612% of the studies reported Cronbach’s alpha as an indicator for reliability (38% reported no reliability estimate at all). Mean Cronbach’s alpha scores for four of the five subscales were below .70. We discuss implications for the measurement of moral foundations and the evidentiary basis of Moral Foundations Theory.
Cited by 0Open access
Dimitris Tsementzis · Synthese · 2016
Cited by 12
Practical Action Publishing eBooks · 1995
Cited by 0
de Jong, Gjalt · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · 2023
Cited by 0
Christina von Nolcken · 2024
Cited by 0
R. Bambrough · Analysis · 1970
There was a most ingenious Architect who had contrived a new Method building Houses, by beginning at the Roof, and working downwards to the Foundation; which he justified to me by the like Practice of those two prudent Insects the Bee and the Spider.
Cited by 0
Pittsburgh (Pa.). City Photographer · University of Pittsburgh Digital Library · 1906
Cited by 0Open access
Hage, J.C., Hage, J.C., Seitter, M. · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2012
Cited by 0
PA Longley · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) · 1998
Cited by 0
Auslander, Louis · Regional conference series in mathematics · 1977
Cited by 0
Maurizio Gabbrielli, Simone Martini · Undergraduate topics in computer science · 2023
Cited by 0
Noel Carrington · 2025
Cited by 0
Linda Jane Shaw · 2022
Cited by 0
Ian Carr, Robert Beamish · University of Manitoba Press eBooks · 1999
Cited by 0
Paul Craig · 2024
Abstract Part II deals with the regulatory and administrative state from the mid-16th to the end of the 19th centuries, coupled with reflection as to the position in the 20th and 21st centuries. It provides the foundation for understanding administrative law doctrine that developed during this period. This is addressed in Part III, which covers Courts and Doctrine, and Part IV, where the focus is on Remedies and Review. This chapter introduces Parts III and IV and addresses four foundational issues that underpin particular topics. The discussion begins with courts, with explanation of the superior common law courts, and the other principal judicial organs, which are the prerogative courts, Chancery, and ecclesiastical courts. The focus then shifts to statute, with discussion of temporal particularity, temporal continuity, and conceptual continuity, the meaning of which is explained in the chapter. This is followed by discussion of doctrine and values.
Cited by 0
Streeter, Burnett Hillman 1874-1937 · 1971
Cited by 0
Carmen Beviá, Luı́s C. Corchón · Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2024
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Cited by 0