Recursion and double recursion
Raphael M. Robinson · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · 1948
Cited by 41Open access
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 10,000 papers for “recursion”
Raphael M. Robinson · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · 1948
Cited by 41Open access
Mazziotta, Nicolas · Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) · 2023
editorial reviewed
Cited by 0Open access
Daniel Lim · 2023
Cited by 0
Daniel Cermak-Sassenrath · 2024
Cited by 0
Saumyendra Sengupta, Carl Phillip Korobkin · c · 1994
Cited by 0
Harvard University Press eBooks · 2009
Cited by 0
Joés M. Garrido · 2009
Cited by 0
Chapman & Hall/CRC numerical analysis and scientific computing · 2009
Cited by 0
Paul R. Wellin · Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2013
Many important and classical problems in mathematics and computer science are defined, or have solutions in terms of recursive definitions: the factorial function, the natural numbers, many divide-and-conquer algorithms, and parsers for programming languages all use recursion in fundamental ways. A function is defined using recursion if in its definition, it makes calls to itself. The great advantage of recursive definitions is their simplicity and directness. Their one major drawback however, is how quickly the depth and complexity can increase to the point of making your computations intractable.
Cited by 0
John Schwartzman · Apress eBooks · 2025
The mathematical sequence factorial is defined recursively as
Cited by 0
David J. Lobina · 2017
Abstract This book provides a comprehensive account of the role of recursion in language in two distinct but interconnected ways. First, it examines how recursion applies at different levels within a full description of natural language. Specifically, it identifies and evaluates recursion as: a) a central property of the computational system underlying the faculty of language; b) a possible feature of the derivations yielded by this computational system; c) a global characteristic of the structures generated by the language faculty; and d) a probable factor in the parsing operations employed during the processing of recursive structures. Secondly, the volume orders these different levels into a tripartite explanatory framework. According to this framework, the investigation of any particular cognitive domain must begin by first outlining what sort of mechanical procedure underlies the relevant capacity (including what sort of structures it generates). Only then, it argues, can we properly investigate its implementation, both at the level of abstract computations typical of competence-level analyses, and at the level of the real-time processing of behaviour.
Cited by 13
Coen de Groot · Apress eBooks · 2023
Cited by 0
2007
Cited by 0
Alexander Shen · Springer undergraduate texts in mathematics and technology · 2009
Cited by 0
2015
Cited by 0
Subrata Saha · 2023
Cited by 0
Cordelia Hall, J. M. O’Donnell · 2000
Cited by 0
Fabrizio Montesi · Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2023
The syntax of choreographies is enhanced with the possibility of writing and invoking recursive procedures, yielding the language of Recursive Choreographies. This opens the door to modelling protocols that allow for retries and data streams of unbounded length. The language of process implementations and the notion of EPP are updated accordingly.
Cited by 0
William Blum · 2009
Cited by 0
John Hunt · Undergraduate topics in computer science · 2023
Cited by 1