Search 250 million research papers

Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.

About 10,000 papers for “reporting guidelines”

Reporting Guidelines

Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman · CHEST Journal · 2008

Cited by 4Open access

Reporting guidelines.

Rémi Colin-Chevalier (18098444), Frédéric Dutheil (447522), Amanda Clare Benson (13621297) et al. · Figshare · 2024

<div>BackgroundThe managerial position affects stress and job satisfaction of workers, but these influences have always been studied separately.ObjectiveWe aimed to assess bivariate influence of the managerial position on workers’ stress and job satisfaction and the inter-relationship of these indicators over time.MethodsWe have analyzed data from workers who use the Wittyfit software, collected annually between 2018 and 2021. Stress and job satisfaction were evaluated by self-report questionnaires. Job position (manager or employee) was provided by the software’s client companies.ResultsData of 704 workers were included in the study. Cross-sectional and longitudinal multivariate analyses revealed that managerial position improves job satisfaction (p<0.001), but not stress (p = 0.4). Overall, while workers’ job satisfaction has improved (p<0.001), stress has remained stable over time (p = 0.3). Three latent groups, with specific evolutionary multi-trajectory of stress and job satisfaction were identified in the sample (entropy = 0.80). Age and seniority, but not gender tended to influence managers’ and employees’ indicators. Over time, stress and job satisfaction have tended to negatively interconnect, in cross-section and in a cross-lagged manner (p<0.001).ConclusionsThe managerial position improves workers’ job satisfaction but has no effect on stress. Sociodemographics including age and seniority, but not gender, can affect this relationship. Stress and job satisfaction can influence each other, both cross-sectionally and over time. To be more effective, organizations should implement holistic strategies targeting multiple indicators.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: <a href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02596737" target="_blank">NCT02596737</a>.</div>

Cited by 0Open access

Reporting guidelines

Szilvia Zörgő, Seung B. Lee, daniela cialfi et al. · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2024

Outlining aspects of QE research projects which can be reported in scientific publications

Cited by 0Open access

Reporting Guidelines

Pradhan, Sweta, Raj, Akanksha, Shetty, Dr Neetha · Figshare · 2023

CONSORT CHECK LIST, CONSORT FLOW DIAGRAM

Cited by 0Open access

Reporting Guidelines

Chief Editor EJMS · Europasian Journal of Medical Sciences · 2025

Reporting Guidelines

Cited by 0Open access

Reporting Guidelines

Soo Young Kim · Korean Journal of Family Medicine · 2009

Cited by 6Open access

Reporting Guidelines

Anthony R. Artino, Anna T. Cianciolo, Erik W. Driessen et al. · Elsevier eBooks · 2021

Cited by 1

Reporting guidelines.

Karani Magutah (4016144), Grace Mbuthia (12413095), James Amisi Akiruga (8563611) et al. · Figshare · 2022

Cited by 0Open access

Reporting guidelines

H, ANANTHU · Figshare · 2023

The data subset contains the following : CONSORT 2010 Checklist CONSORT Flow diagram

Cited by 1Open access

Reporting Guidelines

Karyn Popham, William A. Calo, Melissa Y. Carpentier et al. · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · 2012

Cited by 13

Reporting Guidelines

Christine Linehan, Gail Birkbeck, Jennifer Baumbusch et al. · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)

Cited by 0

Reporting Guidelines

Sweta Pradhan, Akanksha Raj, Dr Neetha Shetty · Figshare · 2023

CONSORT CHECK LIST, CONSORT FLOW DIAGRAM

Cited by 0Open access

Reporting guidelines.

Yang Yann Foo (11934063), Xiaohui Xin (4839663), Qianhui Cheng (11934069) et al. · Figshare · 2025

<div> Introduction Patient experience of interprofessional collaboration in primary care has been well-studied but not in specialist clinics. Our qualitative study aimed to understand patients’ experience of a nurse-doctor collaboration at three specialist clinics (Epilepsy Clinic, Neuroimmunology Clinic, and Persistent Concussion Clinic) in a tertiary neurology care centre in Singapore. Methodology Between December 2023 and April 2024, participants of different demographic and disease profiles from the three specialist clinics were recruited using maximum variation selection. We generated observation and interview data to understand patient experience in a multifaceted and in-depth manner. We analyzed the data using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis. Results We observed 27 patients, of whom 12 agreed to be interviewed. We constructed two themes. The first discussed the patients’ varied receptivity to interprofessional collaboration depending on their perceived healthcare needs. Most patients valued collaborative care as it saved time and enhanced their access to psychosocial and financial support. However, patients whose disease status was still active preferred to consult the doctors for symptomatic management through drug treatment. They were observed to be reticent about sharing their preference with the care team. The second theme examined the absence of formal introduction of the concept of interprofessional collaboration to the patients. Some patients appeared to be unaware that specialist nurses were qualified to collaborate with doctors, and this lowered their perceptions of the nurses’ competence and seemingly weakened their receptivity to IPC. Conclusion Patients’ experience of IPC at specialist clinics varied depending on patients’ perceived healthcare needs. To optimize patients’ receptivity to IPC, the provision of collaborative care should be calibrated to fulfill different patients’ perceived and actual healthcare needs. Doing so may optimize the value of collaborative care to patients. Further enhancements to patients’ receptivity would involve the intentional effort to prepare patients for collaborative practice. </div>

Cited by 0Open access

Reporting guidelines

Anna Fatchiya, Irma Andriani, Muhammad Alif et al. · Open MIND · 2026

Completed Research Checklist (ObsQual) for the F1000Research study protocol on GEDSI governance of access to basic services for persons with disabilities in Indonesia.

Cited by 0Open access

Reporting guidelines

Courtney Soderberg, April Clyburne-Sherin · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2016

Collection of work regarding reporting guidelines for use by COS projects + products

Cited by 0

Reporting guidelines

H ANANTHU · Figshare · 2023

The data subset contains the following : CONSORT 2010 Checklist CONSORT Flow diagram

Cited by 0Open access