Glenn P. Forney, Walter W. Jones · 1990
This paper discusses the use of software tools to aid in the development of models produced by the Center for Fire Research (CFR). There are two typjes of tools described in this paper. The first type consists of executable programs that characterize the subroutine and data structures of FORTRAN programs. A second class of software tools are subroutines that support various utility functions required by CFR models. We will discuss how each of these tools are used and why their development was necessary. In addition, we will indicate how these toots might be improved.
Cited by 1Open access
Nasser Kehtarnavaz, Forough Saki, A. Durán · Synthesis lectures on signal processing · 2019
Cited by 0
Nasser Kehtarnavaz, Forough Saki, A. Durán et al. · Synthesis lectures on signal processing · 2020
Cited by 1
Andriole, Stephen J · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 1986
Cited by 0
Houghton, Raymond C., Center for Programming Science and Technology (Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology) · The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association
Cited by 0Open access
Fang, R, Wang, R, Wang, Xiaofeng · View · 1999
Cited by 0
Raymond C Houghton · 1982
Cited by 44Open access
Diomidis Spinellis · 2008
Cited by 0
Matilda Johanna Wikar · Osuva (University of Vaasa) · 2019
Artificial intelligence can be used to automate various tasks, also within software development. \nThe purpose of this thesis was to research what kind of artificially intelligent \nsoftware development tools and methods are available, and how they could suit a software \ndevelopment team at Wärtsilä. To illustrate this, a recommendation based on available \nliterature was made on how the Wärtsilä team could possibly take intelligent software \ndevelopment tools into use. Based on the findings, a proof of concept regarding software \ntest automation was developed. \nFirst, different types of artificial intelligence were presented, which after a research plan \nfor how to conduct the literature review and the proof of concept was made. To find the \nmost suitable topic for the proof of concept the literature review was first conducted. \nFocus was set on three areas – artificial intelligence assisted programming, bug handling \ntools and software testing. Software test automation seemed the most interesting from a \nWärtsilä perspective, thus it was selected as the topic for the proof of concept. A prototype \nof a neural network that analyses C-functions and recommends a unit test based on the \nsimilarity to other functions was developed. \nConclusions drawn are that artificial intelligence-based methods in software development \nhas potential, but no tool was found that would directly suit Wärtsilä at this point. Either \nthe tools need to be developed further to suit the field of embedded software development, \nor Wärtsilä could adapt their way of working for some tool to be taken into usage or \ndevelop their own solutions. The proof of concept illustrates how an own solution could \nbe an alternative, if developed further in accordance to the improvement suggestions on \nhow to make it more efficient.
Cited by 1Open access
Nasser Kehtarnavaz, Abhishek Sehgal, Shane Parris et al. · Synthesis lectures on signal processing · 2020
Cited by 1
Raymond C Houghton · 1982
Cited by 0
Sun Microsystems UK Ltd. · Knowledge-Based Systems · 1988
Cited by 2
Nasser Kehtarnavaz, Abhishek Sehgal, Shane Parris · Synthesis lectures on signal processing · 2019
Cited by 0
O.M. Shynkaruk, OKSANA YASHYNA, O. ONYSHKO · Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University Technical sciences · 2020
At the present stage of development of software tools in the field of web development, the number of web frameworks (VFK) has increased sharply. All of them have a number of advantages and disadvantages, and therefore it is important to choose the right and appropriate framework or set for each project, because the right choice depends on the quality, implementation time and reliability of each software product being developed. Generally speaking, web frameworks have definitely changed and improved their programming capabilities and become an integral part of the development process. There is a large amount of information related to VFK, but often this information contains only definitions and complex terms that do not give any idea about these tools. That is why the question of justifying the variable choice of frameworks and their impact on software quality is an urgent task at the present stage of programming development. This article presents the results of research on existing tools and the definition of theoretical aspects of the use of modern frameworks for software development, as well as justification of the feasibility and impact of choice variability on the software applications quality. The main results of the study are the rationale for the frameworks’ choice for software development. It should be noted that despite the large number of frameworks, the structured analysis was carried out by a rather small number of researchers, which determines the scientific novelty of this issue. The practical significance lies in the possibility of using certain frameworks in accordance with the needs of the customer and the developer to achieve certain results in software development.
Cited by 0Open access
Keith Phalp · Information and Software Technology · 1993
Cited by 8
2014
Cited by 0
Cristy Elizabeth Aguilar Ojeda, Lorena Mendoza Guzmán, Talhia Heidi Hernández Omaña · Journal of Engineering Research · 2024
Cited by 0Open access
RH Eldridge · Information and Software Technology · 1989
Cited by 44
Raymond C Houghton · 1981
The National Bureau of Standards' was established by an act ot Congress on March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is
Cited by 6Open access
G.E. Cort, R. O. Nelson · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 1985
We present the details of a strategy for acquiring a comprehensive set of software tools to support a life-cycle-based software development methodology. Specific criteria for evaluating software tools are presented with examples from the Los Alamos tool kit. The importance of an environment to support both the tools and the methodology is discussed. 3 refs.
Cited by 0Open access