Skip to content
Free planNo credit card requiredStart writing
AI for Research home
AI for Research home
Dashboard
Sign inGet started

Search 250 million research papers

Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.

About 10,000 papers for “tool evaluation”

Evaluation tool

Laudine Carbuccia, Coralie Chevallier, Valentin Thouzeau · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2023

Cited by 0

Evaluation tool

Laudine Carbuccia, Valentin Thouzeau, Coralie Chevallier · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)

Cited by 0

Mentor Evaluation Tool.

Michi Yukawa (8980721), Stuart A. Gansky (8980724), Patricia O’Sullivan (8980727) et al. · Figshare · 2020

Cited by 0Open access

Heuristic Evaluation Tool

Grau Prim, Albert, Soliz Churata, Jennifer · 2018

En aquest document s’explica el disseny i la implementació d’una aplicació web anomenada Heuristic EvaluationTool, encarregada de realitzar l’estudi d’usabilitat d’altres
\naplicacions i projectes informàtics, d’aqui en endavant denominat projecte.
\nL’aplicació sorgeix de l’eina utilitzada fins al moment(un fitxer Excel) que evalua la
\nusabilitat de la interfície d’un projecte.Es tracta de dissenyar l’aplicació des de zero per
\ntal d’assolir i millorar els objectius de l’eina esmentada anterior.L’avaluació conté un
\nquestionari o plantilla amb principis hurístics definits,que engloba les característiques
\nque fan que un projecte es consideri usable.A mesura que les avaluacions vagin sent
\nrealitzades, l’aplicació s’encarrega de calcular un percentatge d’usabilitat juntament amb
\nla seva representació gràfica de totes les avaluacions,realitzades pels usuaris assignats
\n(anomenats avaluadors) de manera individual i global.
\nPer al desenvolupament i testeig de l’aplicació, s’ha tingut en compte que els dispositius
\namb els quals es realitzaran les avaluacions poden ser ordenadors o tablets, ja que algunes
\nfuncionalitats estan pensades per aconseguir una millora d’accessibilitat i qualitat de
\nl’aplicació. També inclou una interfície gràfica senzilla i amigable i un backend robust.

Cited by 0Open access

SCHEDULE EVALUATION TOOL

Johanne Mainville, Sonia Di Lillo, Nathalie Poirier et al. · University of Ottawa Press eBooks · 2024

Cited by 0

AN EVALUATION TOOL

Judith Harwood · Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing · 2004

Scientific and Clinical Abstracts From the 36th Annual Wound, Ostomy and Continence Conference: Tampa, Florida: June 5–9, 2004: Practice Innovation Abstracts: Category—Professional Practice

Cited by 0

TOOL EVALUATION (FATE)

Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, Eec Note No, Gérard Mavoian (steria et al. · 2008

reproduced in any form without the Agency’s permission. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the Agency. FUA ASSESSMENT and TOOL EVALUATION (FATE) This document has been collated by mechanical means. Should there be missing pages, please report to: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre

Cited by 0

Co-Evaluation Tool

Mel Woods, Raquel Ajates, Melehat Nil Güları et al. · 2020

This is an open-source downloadable that has been developed with community-led citizen science projects in mind. This tool was originally used in the GROW Observatory as a way to evaluate individual and community-based knowledge, practices and interest about soil, science, policy and environment. This tool has been adapted so that you can use it on other types of citizen science projects too.<br/><br/>The Co-Evaluation tool for citizen science projects aims at capturing how participation in a project has changed knowledge, practices and policy. This tool builds on the [Place Standard Tool](http://www.placestandard.scot/); it focuses on ten indicators of the different types of impact that could result from a project. This tool is designed for community members and citizen science practitioners wanting to evaluate a project. It provides prompting questions for discussions amongst participants, allowing communities and project managers to consider these indicators in a methodical way. This tool can be used at the end of a project to assess the impacts and changes achieved. It can also be useful at the beginning of a project as a way to collect a baseline to compare to at the end of the project. Its discussion-based approach also helps create rapport and mutual understanding amongst stakeholders.<br/> <br/>This page includes a guidance document which outlines the tool, the steps, resources needed and useful links that can explain the process of using the tool yourself. The page also includes a canvas to be used in conducting this activity with a community.<br/>

Cited by 2Open access

Tool Evaluation Results

Jingyuan, Shen · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023

The results of the tool evaluation survey.

Cited by 0Open access

Adherence evaluation tool.

Anna Bertram (532260), Jan Fuge (532257), Hendrik Suhling (532255) et al. · Figshare · 2019

Cited by 0Open access

BBF evaluation tool

Henning Lyngsø FOGED, Ida Sylwan, Priscila Duarte de Morais Lima · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2026

This spreadsheet model is meant for evaluation of the direct impacts of bio-based fertiliser (BBF) production value chains on climate, environment and economy. The model considers activities that strictly relate to the i) collection of organic wastes, ii) processing of it into BBFs (fully or partly biobased) and iii) distribution of the fertiliser products with the recycled nutrients, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), to the location where it will be used for crop fertilisation. The idea of the model is that only processes with a primary nutrient recycling function should be assessed; larger facility operations, such as energy generation or unrelated waste treatment, are excluded. For example, in biogas plants, only the digestate treatment steps aimed at BBF production are included within the SOUP boundary, while energy generation and unrelated waste handling processes are omitted. The model is referred to as a a Single Operation Unit Process (SOUP) model. The SOUP model-based evaluation is thus assuming that the influent nutrient-rich organic wastes have alternative use, and the result of the evaluation reveals the performance of the BBF value chain in relation to a baseline.

Cited by 0Open access

BBF evaluation tool

Henning Lyngsø FOGED, Ida Sylwan, Priscila Duarte de Morais Lima · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2026

This spreadsheet model is meant for evaluation of the direct impacts of bio-based fertiliser (BBF) production value chains on climate, environment and economy. The model considers activities that strictly relate to the i) collection of organic wastes, ii) processing of it into BBFs (fully or partly biobased) and iii) distribution of the fertiliser products with the recycled nutrients, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), to the location where it will be used for crop fertilisation. The idea of the model is that only processes with a primary nutrient recycling function should be assessed; larger facility operations, such as energy generation or unrelated waste treatment, are excluded. For example, in biogas plants, only the digestate treatment steps aimed at BBF production are included within the SOUP boundary, while energy generation and unrelated waste handling processes are omitted. The model is referred to as a a Single Operation Unit Process (SOUP) model. The SOUP model-based evaluation is thus assuming that the influent nutrient-rich organic wastes have alternative use, and the result of the evaluation reveals the performance of the BBF value chain in relation to a baseline.

Cited by 0Open access

Evaluation Tool Kit

Girvan, Carina, Todorova, Christina · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018

This document presents the development and contents of the evaluation tool kit to be used in the evaluation of workshops during years 2 and 3 of the project. It is designed to be implemented by any partner in any ER4STEM context to collect data which will be analysed and form part of the yearly evaluation.

Cited by 0Open access

Literacy evaluation tool

Feldpausch, Becky, Nichols, Jean, Rempel, Robin · The COCOON platform (University of Paris) · 1998

https://www.sil.org/resources/archives/23275

Cited by 0

Publisher Evaluation Tool

Collins, Nina · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) · 2021

The Publisher Evaluation Tool, or PET Project, is a scored checklist that can help scholars make more informed decisions about whether or not to submit their work to an unknown publisher. The Publisher Evaluation Tool was developed as part of a workshop for graduate students and faculty that explores deceptive journal practices, often called "predatory" practices. It is particularly useful in addressing those journals in the gray area: not quite green light, not quite red light.

Cited by 0Open access

SCHEDULE EVALUATION TOOL

Johanne Mainville, Sonia Di Lillo, Nathalie Poirier et al. · University of Ottawa Press eBooks · 2024

Cited by 0

Authoring tool evaluation

Anthony Wilson, K.S. Klenk, Alan Coday et al. · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 1994

This paper discusses and evaluates a number of authoring tools currently on the market. The tools evaluated are Visix Galaxy, NeuronData Open Interface Elements, Sybase Gain Momentum, XVT Power++, Aimtech IconAuthor, Liant C++/Views, and Inmark Technology zApp. Also discussed is the LIST project and how this evaluation is being used to fit an authoring tool to the project.

Cited by 0Open access