Skip to content
Free planNo credit card requiredStart writing
AI for Research home
AI for Research home
Dashboard
Sign inGet started

Search 250 million research papers

Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.

About 10,000 papers for “user evaluation”

User evaluation

Yifan Xu · Figshare · 2023

This is data for the user evaluation

Cited by 0Open access

User evaluation

Xu, Yifan · Figshare · 2023

This is data for the user evaluation

Cited by 0Open access

User evaluation

Xu, Yifan · Figshare · 2023

This is data for the user evaluation

Cited by 0Open access

User Friendly Evaluation

C. Jeff Woods · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · 1995

Each congregation must evaluate itself in light of its own mix of gifts, backgrounds, talents, and opportunities. Presenting the best of evaluation theory past and present, Woods shows clergy and lay leaders how to engage in mutual evaluation-not judgment-of ministry, mission, and community as a shared responsibility. The goal is building up the congregation. A special chapter provides commentary from church evaluation experts Roy Oswald (Alban), Paul Light (ABUSA denominational staff), and Jill Hudson (PCUSA judicatory executive) on dilemmas congregations face in evaluation.

Cited by 0

ozan1982-user evaluation

Muci, Irene · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025

Nell'ambito del progetto Ozan 1982 Ozan1982 è stata svolta la prima fase di test che ha coinvolto un campione di 31 visitatori. Nella tabella allegata sono presenti i primi risultati e il modulo di consenso da parte degli utenti. Il questionario ha avuto l'obiettivo di verificare se Ozan1982 avesse la capacità di suscitare la curiosità dei visitatori e soprattutto se questi fossero disposti a scoprire la fine della storia di Maia e a visitare il museo. Il questionario è stato impostato secondo la scala Likert, da 1 a 5 ed in più sono state aggiunte domande a testo libero per raccogliere suggerimenti liberi utili.

Cited by 0Open access

User evaluation report

Ponomareva, Natalia · JISC Information Environment Repository (Jisc) · 2012

Cited by 0Open access

ModARO User Study Evaluation - User Questionnaire Responses

Oscar Manglaras · The University of Adelaide · 2026

Questionnaire responses for a user study comparing ModARO (MODular Architecture Reconstruction Orchestrator) to another architecture reconstruction tool (ReSSA) to evaluate its usefulness and usability.

Cited by 0Open access

Evaluation Methodologies and User Involvement in User

Modeling And Adaptive, Cristina Gena · 2003

In this paper I would like to present the main issues and conclusions of my PhD thesis, which has been dedicated to the problem of evaluation and testing of user modeling and adaptive systems. Regular and less explored approaches are taken into account and new perspectives and example are here sketched.

Cited by 0

ModARO User Study Evaluation - User Questionnaire Responses

Oscar Manglaras · The University of Adelaide · 2026

Questionnaire responses for a user study comparing ModARO (MODular Architecture Reconstruction Orchestrator) to another architecture reconstruction tool (ReSSA) to evaluate its usefulness and usability.

Cited by 0Open access

Evaluation of user interfaces

Oppermann, R., Reiterer, H., Gesellschaft fuer Mathematik und Datenverarbeitung m.b.H. Bonn (GMD), St. Augustin (Germany) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 1991

Available from TIB Hannover: RN 9844(552) / FIZ - Fachinformationszzentrum Karlsruhe / TIB - Technische Informationsbibliothek

Cited by 0

Northeast Corridor User Evaluation.

Joseph Harrigan · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · 1980

This report describes an evaluation of the Northeast Helicopter Corridor Routes (NEC). The Northeast Corridor is an experimental route between Boston and Washington, D.C., consisting of two, one-way, reduced width airways designed expressly for helicopter operations. The evaluation is a joint effort of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Helicopter Association of America (HAA). The data being gathered is in the form of data extraction tapes from Automated Radar Terminal Service (ARTS) equipped air traffic control (ATC) facilities along the routes and flight logs submitted by the helicopter pilots after each corridor test flight. The test flights are being made as cooperating corporate helicopter operators fly the corridor in the course of their normal operations. The data collection phase of this evaluation began July 15, 1979, and will continue until July 15, 1980. (Author)

Cited by 0

User Interface Systems Evaluation

Human Factors · 2008

The development of user interface systems has languished with the stability of desktop computing. Future systems, however, that are off-the-desktop, nomadic or physical in nature will involve new devices and new software systems for creating interactive applications. Simple usability testing is not adequate for evaluating complex systems. A set of criteria for evaluating new UI systems work is presented.

Cited by 0