article · Journal of Forensic Sciences · 2009
Body Height Measurements in Images
Bart Hoogeboom, Ivo Alberink, Mirelle Goos
Cited by 30Abstract and details only
Abstract
For any measurement of a person's height in an image, a difference exists between the actual height of the person and the image measurement. In order to gain knowledge about statistical behavior of differences between actual and measured heights it is necessary to make reference recordings, e.g., of test persons under the same recording conditions. To test whether the differences are dependent on camera and further circumstances, an experiment was set up which involved the measurement of 22 test persons using three cameras of varying quality. Reproducibility of measurements per image appears to be strongly dependent on the camera (quality), whereas systematic bias differs with the view point of the camera. Operator dependency of the measurement process is found, so its repetition by different operators is recommended.
Cite this paper
Hoogeboom, B., Alberink, I., & Goos, M. (2009). Body Height Measurements in Images. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54(6), 1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01179.x
Hoogeboom, Bart, et al. “Body Height Measurements in Images.” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 54, no. 6, 2009, pp. 1365–75, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01179.x.
Hoogeboom, Bart, Ivo Alberink, and Mirelle Goos. 2009. “Body Height Measurements in Images.” Journal of Forensic Sciences 54 (6): 1365–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01179.x.
Hoogeboom, B., Alberink, I. and Goos, M. (2009) ‘Body Height Measurements in Images’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54(6), pp. 1365–1375. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01179.x.
@article{hoogeboom2009body,
title = {{Body Height Measurements in Images}},
author = {Hoogeboom, Bart and Alberink, Ivo and Goos, Mirelle},
journal = {Journal of Forensic Sciences},
volume = {54},
number = {6},
pages = {1365--1375},
year = {2009},
doi = {10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01179.x}
}Made from the index record. Check names, capitalisation and page numbers against the paper. Need another style? AI for Research has over 10,000.
Related papers
The reproducibility of reported height and body weight in repeated questionnaire surveys.
Haruo Nakatsuka, H Satoh, T Watanabe et al. · PubMed · 1995
Cited by 6
Short- and long-term reproducibility of radioisotopic examination of gastric emptying
KRZYSZTOF JONDERKO · International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation Part B Nuclear Medicine and Biology · 1990
Cited by 20
The reproducibility of scores from three video formats.
John J. Norcini, J A Shea, Lynn O. Langdon et al. · PubMed · 1988
Cited by 1
Comparisons of probing depth measurements with Florida probe and conventional periodontal probe
Sha Yueqi · Journal of Modern Stomatology · 2005
Cited by 0
Natural head posture--considerations of reproducibility
Dirk Bister, R J Edler, B D M Tom et al. · European Journal of Orthodontics · 2002
Cited by 69
280 A Snapshot into the Demonstration of Reproducibility of Cardiac Imaging Biomarkers
A. Gupta, Sukhmandeep Sangha, Kazuaki Negishi et al. · Heart Lung and Circulation · 2020
Cited by 0Open access
Some variables affecting reproducibility in capillary electrophoresis
Zakariya K. Shihabi, Mark E. Hinsdale · Electrophoresis · 1995
Cited by 43
THE REPRODUCIBILITY AND REPEATABILITY OF THE PSV DETERMINATION
L W Tubey, P G Jordan · 1973
Cited by 1