Structuring Content
Good Governance · 2005
Cited by 0
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 10,000 papers for “Structuring”
Good Governance · 2005
Cited by 0
B. S. Daya Sagar, D. Arun Kumar · Encyclopedia of earth sciences series/Encyclopedia of earth sciences · 2023
Cited by 2
Arash Rahimi‐Iman · Springer series in solid-state sciences · 2021
Cited by 0
Sybil Wolfram · 2023
Cited by 0
Arjen van Dalen · 2023
Cited by 0
Yvette Peters · 2017
Cited by 0
2012
Cited by 0
Felix I. Lessambo · 2021
Cited by 0
E.R. Yescombe · Elsevier eBooks · 2007
Cited by 1
University Research Chair) · Encyclopedia of Database Systems · 2009
Cited by 0
Julianne Payne, Jeffrey Leiter · Journal of Health Organization and Management · 2013
The authors understand changes in the healthcare industry as resulting from an increasingly powerful managerial logic, at odds with traditional professional and societal values. Interest groups are best positioned to challenge this logic.
Cited by 14
Panov, Evgeny · Figshare · 2021
*=spacecraft probe (3, 4 or 5)<br><br>P*_B.txt - magnetic field vector<br>P*_E.txt - electric field vector<br>P*_eflux_energy.txt - differential energy flux as function of time and energy<br>P*_eflux_phi.txt - differential energy flux as function of time and azimuthal angle<br>P*_Ne.txt - electron density<br>P*_pos.txt - spacecraft position<br>P*_Ptens.txt - plasma pressure tensor<br>P*_SCPot.txt - spacecraft potential<br>P*_T.txt - average ion temperature<br>P*_Tmag.txt - ion temperature components perpendicualr and parallel to the magnetic field<br>P*_V.txt - ion velocity vector<br>x_?_y_?.dat - three virtual spacecraft data at the corresponding x and y locations in the PIC simulation box (Figure 3)<br>?_xy_?.dat - PIC simulation data for Figure 2?_yz_?.dat - PIC simulation data for Figure 4<br><br><br>
Cited by 0Open access
2015
Cited by 0
University of Wisconsin Digital Collections (University of Wisconsin)
Cited by 0
Sebastian Watzl · Oxford University Press eBooks · 2017
Abstract What is attention? How does attention shape consciousness? In an approach that engages with foundational topics in the philosophy of mind, the theory of action, psychology, and the neurosciences, this book provides a unified and comprehensive answer to both questions. It shows that attention is a central structural feature of the mind. The first half of the book provides an account of the nature of attention. Attention is prioritizing. It consists in regulating priority structures. Attention is not another element of the mind, but is constituted by structures that organize, integrate, and coordinate the parts of our mind. Attention thus integrates the perceptual and intellectual, the cognitive and motivational, and the epistemic and practical. The second half of the book concerns the relationship between attention and consciousness. It argues that attentional structure shapes consciousness into what is central and what is peripheral. The center-periphery structure of consciousness cannot be reduced to the structure of how the world appears to the subject. What it is like for us thus goes beyond the way the world appears to us. On this basis, a new view of consciousness is offered. In each conscious experience we actively take a stance on the world we appear to encounter. It is in this sense that our conscious experience is our subjective perspective.
Cited by 235
MARRONE, PIERPAOLO · ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) · 2013
In this paper I offer some observations on the liberalism of Ackerman and I interpret it as a mixed method of solution of the problems of rivalness of goods by mean of a set of dialogical norms.
Cited by 1Open access
Oxford University Press eBooks · 2023
Cited by 0
Mike Yearworth · 2024
Current perspectives on approaches to problem structuring in operational research and engineering and prospects for problem structuring methods applicable to a wide range of practice. Bridging between operational research (OR) and engineering practice, Problem Structuring: Methodology in Practice is grounded in the emergence of soft OR and its development over time as a distinctively new field, broadening the scope of OR to deal with issues of transforming, strategising, and planning in the context of wicked problems. The book is centred on a methodological framing of intervention processes known as problem structuring methods (PSMs) and the techniques presented are suitable for practitioners across a broad range of disciplines. Written by a highly qualified professor of engineering and management, Problem Structuring: Methodology in Practice contains four linked sections that cover: I. Problem formulation when dealing with wicked problems, justification for a methodological approach, the emergence of soft OR, the relevance of pragmatic philosophy to OR practice. II. Traces debates and issues in OR leading to the emergence of soft OR, comparative analysis of PSMs leading to a generic framework for soft OR practice, addressing practical considerations in delivering PSM interventions. III. Charts the emergence of a problem structuring sensibility in engineering practice, introduces a new PSM based on hierarchical process modelling (HPM) supported by teaching and case studies, makes the case for a processual turn in engineering practice supported by HPM with relevance to OR practice. IV. Evaluation of PSM interventions, survey of applications, use of group support systems, new developments supported by machine learning, recontextualising soft OR practice. Problem Structuring: Methodology in Practice is a thought-provoking and highly valuable resource relevant to all “students of problems.” It is suitable for any UK Level 7 (or equivalent) programme in OR, engineering, or applied social science where a reflective, methodological approach to dealing with wicked problems is an essential requirement for practice.
Cited by 1
Hugh Beyer · Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics · 2025
Cited by 0
Graeme Harper · 2025
Does it come simply from understanding others or something more than this, the thing? You know, the thing? Where you read a poem or watch a film or hear the words of a song and it appears the writer of that work is speaking directly to you? Individually, specifically, to you.
Cited by 0