Inductive Reasoning
2011
Cited by 0
Read the abstract, see who wrote it and who cites it, and get the citation in APA, MLA, Chicago or Harvard.
About 6,677 papers for “Inductive reasoning”
2011
Cited by 0
Bruno Sauce, Louis D. Matzel · 2017
Cited by 24
Brett K. Hayes, Evan Heit, Haruka Swendsen · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · 2010
Inductive reasoning entails using existing knowledge or observations to make predictions about novel cases. We review recent findings in research on category-based induction as well as theoretical models of these results, including similarity-based models, connectionist networks, an account based on relevance theory, Bayesian models, and other mathematical models. A number of touchstone empirical phenomena that involve taxonomic similarity are described. We also examine phenomena involving more complex background knowledge about premises and conclusions of inductive arguments and the properties referenced. Earlier models are shown to give a good account of similarity-based phenomena but not knowledge-based phenomena. Recent models that aim to account for both similarity-based and knowledge-based phenomena are reviewed and evaluated. Among the most important new directions in induction research are a focus on induction with uncertain premise categories, the modeling of the relationship between inductive and deductive reasoning, and examination of the neural substrates of induction. A common theme in both the well-established and emerging lines of induction research is the need to develop well-articulated and empirically testable formal models of induction. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Cited by 96
Bagchi, Sitansusekhar · 1953
Cited by 0
Harry Gensler · 2010
Introduction to Logic offers one of the most clear, interesting and accessible introductions to what has long been considered one of the most challenging subjects in philosophy. Harry Gensler engages students with the basics of logic through practical examples and important arguments both in the history of philosophy and from contemporary philosophy. Using simple and manageable methods for testing arguments, students are led step-by-step to master the complexities of logic.The companion LogiCola instructional program and various teaching aids (including a teacher's manual) are available from the book's website: www.routledge.com/textbooks/gensler_logic
Cited by 0
G. Mana · Springer series in measurement science and technology · 2026
Cited by 0
Ming Li, Paul Vitányi · DIMACS series in discrete mathematics and theoretical computer science · 1994
Cited by 1
Aidan Feeney, Aidan Feeney, Aidan Feeney et al. · Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2001
Without inductive reasoning, we couldn't generalize from one instance to another, derive scientific hypotheses, or predict that the sun will rise again tomorrow morning. Despite the widespread nature of inductive reasoning, books on this topic are rare. Indeed, this is the first book on the psychology of inductive reasoning in twenty years. The chapters survey recent advances in the study of inductive reasoning and address questions about how it develops, the role of knowledge in induction, how best to model people's reasoning, and how induction relates to other forms of thinking. Written by experts in philosophy, developmental science, cognitive psychology, and computational modeling, the contributions here will be of interest to a general cognitive science audience as well as to those with a more specialized interest in the study of thinking.
Cited by 33
Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology · 2008
Cited by 0
James H. Hyslop · Charles Scribner's Sons eBooks · 2013
Cited by 0
Davidson, Janet E. · University Library Heidelberg · 2019
Cited by 2Open access
Peter Henderson · ACM SIGCSE Bulletin · 2003
article Share on Inductive reasoning Author: Peter B. Henderson View Profile Authors Info & Claims ACM SIGCSE BulletinVolume 35Issue 2June 2003 pp 27–29https://doi.org/10.1145/782941.782969Published:01 June 2003Publication History 2citation261DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations2Total Downloads261Last 12 Months4Last 6 weeks1 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
Cited by 3
Henry E. Kyburg · Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2008
In days of yore, logic was neatly divided into two parts, Deductive Logic and Inductive Logic (Mill 1949/1843). The two parts were often taught as parts of a single course. Inductive logic has faded away, and now the very term has acquired a slightly antiquated patina. It has also acquired a number of quite specific modern meanings.
Cited by 4
Harry J. Gensler · 2017
Cited by 0
Easy Quizzz · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2026
The document titled "Inductive Reasoning Tests" provides a comprehensive insights into the nature and structure of inductive reasoning assessments. Designed for educators, psychologists, and HR professionals, it outlines various types of tests that evaluate an individual's capacity to identify patterns, make generalizations, and draw logical conclusions from specific information. The resource includes sample questions, detailed scoring guidelines, and best practices for administering these tests effectively. This document serves as an essential tool for understanding how inductive reasoning can be measured and the implications of these assessments in educational and occupational contexts. It aims to enhance the capabilities of professionals in designing and interpreting reasoning tests while advocating for the importance of this skill in cognitive development and problem-solving scenarios. Original Page: https://www.easy-quizzz.com/au/aptitude-test/assessment-test/inductive-reasoning-tests-pdf/
Cited by 0Open access
Claudia d'Amato, Floriana Esposito, Nicola Fanizzi, Bettina Fazzinga et al. · 2010
Extensive research activities are recently directed towards the Semantic Web as a future form of the Web. Consequently, Web search as the key technology of the Web is evolving towards some novel form of Semantic Web search. A very promising recent approach to such Semantic Web search is based on combining standard Web search with ontological background knowledge and using standard Web search engines as the main inference motor of Semantic Web search. In this paper, we propose to further enhance this approach to Semantic Web search by the use of inductive reasoning. This adds the important ability to handle inconsistencies, noise, and incompleteness, which often occur in distributed and heterogeneous environments, such as the Web. We report on a prototype implementation of the new approach and extensive experimental results.
Cited by 0
Joachim I. Krueger, David Joachim Grüning, Patrick R. Heck et al. · Psychological Inquiry · 2024
Cited by 8Open access
Easy Quizzz · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2026
The document titled "Inductive Reasoning Tests" provides a comprehensive insights into the nature and structure of inductive reasoning assessments. Designed for educators, psychologists, and HR professionals, it outlines various types of tests that evaluate an individual's capacity to identify patterns, make generalizations, and draw logical conclusions from specific information. The resource includes sample questions, detailed scoring guidelines, and best practices for administering these tests effectively. This document serves as an essential tool for understanding how inductive reasoning can be measured and the implications of these assessments in educational and occupational contexts. It aims to enhance the capabilities of professionals in designing and interpreting reasoning tests while advocating for the importance of this skill in cognitive development and problem-solving scenarios. Original Page: https://www.easy-quizzz.com/au/aptitude-test/assessment-test/inductive-reasoning-tests-pdf/
Cited by 0Open access
Joachim I. Krueger, David Joachim Grüning, Patrick R. Heck et al. · 2023
We introduce the Inductive Reasoning Model (IRM) as a comprehensive platform for the study of several phenomena central to self- and social perception. Going beyond the traditional phenomenon-focused research strategy, the model shows how to generate point-specific hypotheses about the size of individual effects and how to predict the interrelations among phenomena of interest. The model points to additional psychological processes at play when outputs cannot be accounted for within the confines of the IRM alone. The IRM is parsimonious in its assumptions and generative in its predictions. Using two empirically-based inputs, namely, the positivity of a person’s self-image and the strength of social projection, the model predicts the direction and extent of four higher-order phenomena: intergroup accentuation, self-enhancement, ingroup favoritism, and differential accuracy. The model affords precise predictions pertaining to the relationships among these phenomena. Critically, alternative conceptions of social perceptions are not rendered irrelevant. Researchers can ask if the IRM over- or underpredicts social-perceptual phenomena in contexts of interest, and if alternative models can explain the differences.
Cited by 5Open access
Clay Rooks, Robert Boyd · Teaching English in the Two-Year College · 2003
This article discusses the logical connection between reasoning inductively and writing compositions in college English classes.
Cited by 0